Social Media as a Digital Catalyst: Moderating Innovation Performance and Gender Equality Among Female Entrepreneurs in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e297559Keywords:
Digital Entrepreneurship, Platform Economy, Innovation Performance, Gender Equality, Social Media EngagementAbstract
Background and Aims: While China’s digital economy continues to expand, a distinct gender gap remains within innovation-led entrepreneurship. This research investigates the role of social media platforms as ‘digital catalysts’ that moderate the translation of innovation performance into gender equality outcomes for female entrepreneurs.
Methodology: Grounded in Digital Catalysis Theory, digital affordance theory, and institutional theory, the study employs a sequential mixed-methods design to validate a novel theoretical framework. The investigation integrates qualitative data from 45 in-depth interviews with a quantitative survey of 1,247 female entrepreneurs. Additionally, an 18-month longitudinal panel study tracking 312 participants was conducted to capture temporal dynamics and causal relationships.
Results: Empirical analysis indicates that social media engagement significantly and positively moderates the link between innovation performance and gender equality. This catalytic process functions through three distinct mechanisms: amplification, acceleration, and transformation. Mediated moderation analysis further identifies network centrality, algorithmic visibility, and digital reputation capital as critical pathways. Crucially, these effects are not uniform but are contingent upon institutional support, industry digitalization levels, and the entrepreneur’s digital proficiency.
Conclusion: By reconceptualizing platforms as active catalysts rather than neutral tools, this study extends the theoretical boundaries of digital entrepreneurship. Practical implications suggest that achieving gender-inclusive innovation requires strategic platform engagement and robust digital infrastructure, moving beyond a sole focus on individual innovation capabilities.
References
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2021). Exploring the false promise of entrepreneurship through a postfeminist critique. Human Relations, 74(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719848480
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2022). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732
Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Guerrero, M., & Schott, T. (2024). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023/2024 global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. (2024). China digital economy development report 2024. CAICT.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Digital Marketing Institute of China. (2024). Gender disparities in digital marketing effectiveness: DMIC annual report. DMIC.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Han, L. (2022). Digital platforms and gendered entrepreneurship in China. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 18, e00345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00345
Harding, S. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Routledge.
He, X., & Chen, Y. (2023). Digital platforms and female entrepreneurship in China. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 35(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2134567
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Science, 65(7), 2966–2981. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093
McAdam, M., Crowley, C., & Harrison, R. T. (2019). The emancipatory potential of female entrepreneurship: A model for investigating its antecedents and consequences. International Small Business Journal, 37(3), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618817312
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Olanrewaju, A. S. T., Hossain, M. A., Whiteside, N., & Mercieca, P. (2020). Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.011
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.07
Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Polity Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.







.png)
