การประยุกต์ทฤษฎีการเรียนรู้เพื่อพัฒนาการสอนโดยเน้นผู้เรียนในยุคดิจิทัล

Phawat Phattananiphakorn; Yosjarus  Duekuntod; Surasak  Usahakanon

doi:10.60027/iarj.2026.e293612

Authors

Phawat Phattananiphakorn Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9997-8808
Yosjarus Duekuntod Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1607-885X
Surasak Usahakanon Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4397-9664

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e293612

Keywords:

Learning Theory, Application, Digital Era Teaching, Digital Learners

Abstract

Background and Aims: The digital era has brought rapid changes to the education system, requiring teaching and learning approaches to adapt to contemporary learning contexts. This article aims to examine the application of learning theory in connecting learning approaches to the characteristics of digital-age learners.

Methodology: This study employed documentary research to analyze concepts and knowledge from textbooks, academic works, and relevant sources, synthesizing them into a new conceptual framework for developing teaching in the digital era.

Results: The findings reveal that each learning theory has distinctive strengths and limitations in five aspects: learning, teaching, assessment, application, and motivation. The integration of the four major theories-Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, and Connectivism-forms an Integrated Learning Cycle (ILC) that enhances instructional effectiveness.

Conclusion: Teaching in the digital era should adopt an integrated approach in which teachers serve as designers of learning environments, while learners act as creators, connectors, and reflective thinkers. This approach contributes to developing digital citizens with competencies who are prepared to face the challenges of the 21st century.

References

บดินทร์ บัวรอด. (2557). ทักษะแห่งอนาคต: การเรียนรู้ในศตวรรษที่ 21. วารสารสารสนเทศ, 13(1), 39–49.

เพ็ญพร ทองคำสุก. (2567). การจัดการเรียนรู้เชิงรุก: แนวทางการศึกษาสู่คุณภาพเพื่อพัฒนาทักษะในศตวรรษที่ 21. วารสารครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบ้านสมเด็จเจ้าพระยา, 18(2), 211–232.

ศิริวรรณ วณิชวัฒนวรชัย. (2562). ทฤษฎีการเรียนรู้เพื่อการสอนในศตวรรษที่ 21. สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2566). รายงานการพัฒนาประเทศตามยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ 20 ปี (พ.ศ. 2561–2580). สศช.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2565). รายงานนโยบายการศึกษาดิจิทัลเพื่อพัฒนาคุณภาพผู้เรียนไทยในศตวรรษที่ 21. กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.

Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97.

Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 98–118.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (Rev. ed.). ASCD.

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(9), 1–36.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada.

Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069.

Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–13.

Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human learning (8th ed.). Pearson.

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Alfred A. Knopf.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining education for a digital world. UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

World Bank. (2007). Building knowledge economies: Advanced strategies for development. World Bank.