A Study on the Similarities and Differences Between Mozart and Rossini's Singing of Figaro's Aria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2026.e289843Keywords:
Mozart, Rossini, Figaro Aria, Opera Singing, Stylistic Comparison, Vocal InterpretationAbstract
Background and Aims: Mozart's The Marriage of Figaro and Rossini's The Barber of Seville are iconic operas derived from Beaumarchais' "Figaro Trilogy." Although both center on the character Figaro, they differ in terms of musical era, compositional philosophy, and stylistic expression. This study examines how Mozart and Rossini, respectively, shape the vocal portrayal of Figaro, focusing on the similarities and differences in their artistic, historical, and musical contexts.
Methodology: A mixed-method approach combining qualitative and quantitative research was employed. Methods include literature review, score analysis, interviews, questionnaires, and SPSS-based statistical analysis. Comparative analysis was used to examine musical structure, lyrical expression, and vocal technique in the arias “Non più andrai” (Mozart) and “Largo al factotum” (Rossini), integrating both historical interpretation and practical vocal performance data.
Results: The findings reveal fundamental differences: Mozart’s Classical aesthetic emphasizes structural balance, clear melodic lines, and subtle emotional expression; Rossini’s Romantic style highlights technical flamboyance, vocal agility, and vibrant theatricality. Figaro’s character in Mozart is portrayed as rational and rebellious, reflecting Enlightenment ideals, while Rossini's Figaro is humorous and energetic, resonating with Romantic individuality. Statistical analysis confirms significant variations in performance style, vocal demands, and interpretive approach between the two works.
Conclusion: The study concludes that differences in historical era, aesthetic values, and compositional intention lead to distinct vocal portrayals of Figaro. Mozart’s version aligns with order and clarity, whereas Rossini’s emphasizes passion and virtuosity. This comparative framework offers pedagogical insights for vocal training and contributes to deeper cross-cultural understanding in opera performance.
References
Abbate, C., & Parker, R. (2012). A history of opera. W. W. Norton & Company.
Gossett, P. (2006). Divas and scholars: Performing Italian opera. University of Chicago Press.
Heartz, D. (2003). Mozart, Haydn, and early Beethoven: 1781–1802. W. W. Norton & Company.
McKinney, J. C. (1994). The diagnosis and correction of vocal faults: A manual for teachers of singing and choir directors. Genovex Music Group.
Miller, R. (2000). Solutions for singers: Tools for performers and teachers. Oxford University Press.
Mozart, W. A. (1786). Le nozze di Figaro [The Marriage of Figaro] [Opera]. Vienna, Austria.
Rosen, C. (1997). The classical style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven (expanded ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Rossini, G. (1816). Il barbiere di Siviglia [The Barber of Seville] [Opera]. Rome, Italy.
Stark, J. (2003). Bel canto: A history of vocal pedagogy. University of Toronto Press.
Taruskin, R. (2005). The Oxford history of Western music: Music in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
.png)
