The Development of Mobile Phone Applications to Promote Phonic Skills in Primary School

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2025.282794

Keywords:

Phonics Skills, Mobile Learning, Educational Technology, Primary Education, English Pronunciation, Language Acquisition, Rural Education, Mobile-assisted Language Learning, Thailand

Abstract

Background and Aims: Phonics instruction plays a critical role in developing foundational reading fluency, pronunciation, and phonemic awareness, particularly in primary education. However, students in Thailand, especially in rural areas like the Phetchaburi Educational Service Area 2, face significant challenges in mastering phonics. These challenges stem from structural differences between Thai and English phonetic systems, the absence of specialized English teachers, and limited exposure to native speakers, resulting in poor reading comprehension, pronunciation difficulties, and low confidence in using English. These educational gaps highlight the urgent need for innovative solutions to support phonics education beyond traditional classroom settings. This study addresses these issues by leveraging mobile technology to develop an engaging phonics learning application. The objectives of the study are fourfold: First, the study seeks to develop a mobile application specifically designed to promote phonics skills among primary school students. Second, it aims to validate the effectiveness of the application by measuring phonics improvement through pretest and posttest assessments. Third, it compares the learning outcomes of students who used the application (experimental group) with those receiving traditional instruction (control group), providing insights into the app's impact. Lastly, the study evaluates students' satisfaction with the app, assessing usability and its influence on learning engagement. These objectives collectively address the critical need for accessible phonics education tools in resource-limited settings.

Methodology:   A mixed-methods approach was adopted to gain comprehensive insights into both learning outcomes and user experiences. The study involved students from a randomly selected school in Phetchaburi Educational Service Area 2, with participants divided into experimental and control groups. Grade 6 students formed the experimental group, using the mobile application for five weeks, while Grade 5 students followed traditional phonics instruction. The quantitative component included pretest-posttest assessments, with a 60-item test covering essential phonics components such as consonants, vowels, clusters, and suffix endings. Qualitative data were gathered through student surveys and focus group interviews, providing deeper insights into their experiences with the application.

Results: The study’s results demonstrate that the mobile application significantly enhanced phonics skills among the experimental group. The mean score for the experimental group improved from 14.7 (pretest) to 45.93 (posttest), a gain of 31.23 points. In contrast, the control group showed a modest improvement from 15.1 to 22.5, with a 7.4-point increase. A two-tailed t-test analysis (t = 29.84, p < 0.05) confirmed that the observed differences between the groups were statistically significant, validating the effectiveness of the mobile app. Students expressed high satisfaction, with average scores of 4.9/5 for learning improvement, 4.8/5 for exercise usefulness, and 4.7/5 for learning at their own pace. These findings indicate the practical effectiveness of the mobile application in enhancing phonics education and student engagement.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of mobile learning tools to address the challenges of phonics education in rural Thailand, offering a scalable solution for areas with limited access to specialized teachers and instructional resources. The significant improvements in phonics performance among students using the mobile application suggest that such tools can serve as effective supplements to traditional instruction, supporting students' phonemic awareness, pronunciation, and reading fluency. These findings have broader implications for educational policy and practice, underscoring the need to integrate technology-based solutions into the curriculum to enhance language learning outcomes. Future research could explore the long-term impact of the application, its adaptability to other regions, and the integration of advanced features such as offline access and adaptive learning modules.

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.

Alrasheedi, M., Capretz, L. F., & Raza, A. (2015). A systematic review of the critical factors for the success of mobile learning in higher education (university students’ perspective). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571928

Baker, C., & Prys Jones, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education. Multilingual Matters.

Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Cui, G., & Zheng, X. (2018). Mobile learning in higher education: Status and future. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.002.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Demir, S., & Akpınar, Y. (2016). Attitude Scale Toward Mobile Learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 47-58.

EF English Proficiency Index. (2023). EF English Proficiency Index: A ranking of 111 countries by their English skills.Retrieved from https://www.ef.com

Foley, J. A. (2005). English in Thailand. REL Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–19.

Gamlo, N. (2019). The impact of mobile learning applications on pronunciation and engagement in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 56–68.

Google for Education. (2022). Teach from anywhere: Global educator resources. Retrieved from https://edu.google.com/intl/en/teachfromanywhere/

Hammond, M., Crosson, S., Fragkouli, E., & Gage, J. (2020). Teacher professional development in digital technology: A systemic review of research. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3575–3598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10158-

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hayes, D. (2010). Language learning, teaching, and educational reform in rural Thailand: An English teacher's perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2010.495843

Hewings, M. (2004). Pronunciation practice activities: A resource book for teaching English pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Hook, J. N., Davis, D., Owen, J., & DeBlaere, C. (2017). Cultural humility: Engaging diverse identities in therapy. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000037-000

Jamaldeen, F., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2019). Gamification in mobile learning: A tool to enhance engagement in English education. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 22(3), 42–55.

Jessada Wari (2014), J. (2014). Phonics and pronunciation: A study with Thai learners. Journal of Language Learning, 7(3), 134–150.

Khansarian-Dehkordi, A., & Ameri-Golestan, S. (2013). Mobile learning and vocabulary retention: A comparative study. Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 45–57.

Kim, H. S., & Park, J. (2019). The effects of mobile learning in English language education: A case of Smart Learning in South Korea. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 15–27.

Kim, H., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2019). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 26–39. Retrieved from https://www.lltjournal.org

Kirkpatrick, A. (2010). English as a lingua franca in ASEAN: A multilingual model. Hong Kong University Press.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2012). Attachment theory and the evolutionary psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(3), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2012.679556

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2017). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 104, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.006

Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249

Mauri Medrano, M., Lafarga Ostáriz, P., Del Barrio Aranda, L., & Soler Costa, R. (2023). Mobile learning and communication: Educational change? Education + Training, 65(2), 193-209.

Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. (2018). Thailand’s digital economy and society development plan. Retrieved from https://www.mdes.go.th

Perry, W. G., & Nichols, J. D. (2014). Mobile learning implementation in rural contexts: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9313-2

Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Harcourt, Brace.

Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and multisensory instruction: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Smyth, D. (2001). Thai: An essential grammar. Routledge.

Tusiime, J. (2021). Mobile learning for early literacy: Successes and challenges from Sub-Saharan Africa. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(6), 172–180.

UNESCO. (2018). A lifeline to learning: Leveraging technology to support education for refugees. UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2017). Understanding students' learning practices: Challenges for designing mobile learning services. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9470-2

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-25

How to Cite

Pankeaw, P., Parichano, P. ., & Klomkul , L. . (2025). The Development of Mobile Phone Applications to Promote Phonic Skills in Primary School . Interdisciplinary Academic and Research Journal, 5(3), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2025.282794

Issue

Section

Articles