Validating Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University’s Computer-Based English Proficiency Test (STOU-EPT) Under the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research study is validating Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University’s English Proficiency Test or STOU-EPT (E-testing) under the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in the terms of (1) test development (2) test structure according to the CEFR’s test level criteria and (3) item difficulty analysis (4) reliability coefficient of each part of the test. The sources of data consisted of the primary sources including four experts with the experiences in English tests under the CEFR, a voluntary test development committee as well as the secondary sources including the answers from the forms of the STOU-EPT (e-testing) given by 800 examinees. The findings were as follows: (1) The test development began with a team of STOU test development committee members participating in the standard English test development training in the United Kingdom, which led to the development of the test specifications using the CEFR criteria under the guidance of an expert in English language testing, also a training leader, who checked test accuracy and congruence with university operation, the test specifications were approved. (2) A world-renowned scholar in the fields of language testing and evaluation was also involved in judging the consistency of the test items with the CEFR criteria. Then the Lexitutor program was used for checking the appropriateness of the language level, and the AWL list was used for checking the appropriateness of the academic words. Most of the test had higher level of items than the CEFR’s criteria.. (3) Regarding the item difficulty of the test, it was found that item difficulty had ranging from 88.00% to 100.00% (4) It was found that the KR-20 reliability coefficient of Part 3 of Reading had the highest reliability ranging from .853 to .893.
Article Details
ข้อความและบทความในวารสารการวัด ประเมินผล สถิติ และการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์ เป็นแนวคิดของผู้เขียน มิใช่ความคิดเห็นของกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร จึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของวารสารการวัด ประเมินผล สถิติ และการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์ บทความในวารสารต้องไม่เคยตีพิมพ์ที่ใดมาก่อน และสงวนสิทธิ์ตามกฎหมายไทย การจะนำไปเผยแพร่ ต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากกองบรรณาธิการ
References
ศรีนครินทรวิโรฒกับกรอบมาตรฐานอ้างอิงสากลของยุโรป. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 12(2): 69-84.
อลิสา วานิชดี และคณะ. (2551). รายงานการวิจัยเรื่อง พัฒนาแบบทดสอบวัดความสามารถด้านการใช้ภาษาอังกฤษโดยใช้สื่ออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ในระบบการศึกษาทางไกล. นนทบุรี: มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมธิราช.
Bradberry, T. (2016, January 19). Why attitude is more important than IQ. https://www.forbes.com/sites/
travisbradberry/2016/01/19/why-attitude-is-more-important-than-iq/ ?sh=2412c9d63bd0
Brown, L. M. (2006). Social Intelligence the New Science of Success. Business Book Review, 23(1), 1-11.
Cherniss, C. & Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: how to select for, measure, and improve Emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
EF. (2019). EFSET Technical background report. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from https://www.efset.org/
th/english-score/cefr/
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Hay Group. (2011). The emotional and social competency inventory (ESCI) user guide. Hay Group.
Korn Ferry. (2017). Emotional and social competency inventory (ESCI) research guide and technical manual. Korn Ferry.
Landry, L. (2019). Why Emotional intelligence is important in leadership. https://online. hbs.edu/blog/post/
emotional-intel ligence-in-leadership
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, N. (2013, December 30). The eight characteristics of effective school leaders. https://www.forbes.com
/sites/nickmorrison/2013/12/30/the-eight-characteristics-of-effective-school-leaders/#21a4bf069762
Patterson, S. E. (2008). Primal leadership: realizing the power of Emotional intelligence [review] / Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., and McKee, A.. Journal of applied Christian leadership, 2(2), 76-80.
The Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. (2012). The emotional competence framework. http://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/emotional_competence_ framework.pdf
University of Bedfordshire. (2019). Centre for research in english language learning and assessment. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from https://www.beds.ac.uk/crella