The Critiques of Zhiyanzhai: Key Evidence in Research on Chinese Literature–The Dream of the Red Chamber
Main Article Content
Abstract
Zhiyanzhai, the critic of the novel Story of the Stone, gained wide recognition and rebranded it as The Dream of the Red Chamber, removing his critiques. This left readers with only one aspect of the literary content. Furthermore, there were multiple instances of copying and duplicating Zhiyanzhai’s critiques. Hence, this research aims to study the content of Zhiyanzhai's critiques and their significant role in the study of Chinese literature, specifically The Dream of the Red Chamber. The research utilizes a combined approach of studying the literary content alongside critiques from three book sources to verify the accuracy of the content. The findings reveal that: 1) The format of the critiques typically includes introductions and concluding summaries, while various formats of critiques are found within the literary content, each specifying the copied edition; 2) The content of the critiques reflects six subtopics: poetic composition and emotions of Cao Xueqin, character identity and life circumstances, the socio-political situation of China during the Qing Dynasty, the status of Cao’s family lineage, the narrative description of the literary content, and critiques on language usage and explanatory terms, idioms, and implied meanings.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี. (2540). เกณฑ์การถ่ายถอดเสียงภาษาจีนแทนดารินด้วยอักขรวิธีไทย.โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
Cao Xueqin曹雪芹. (2015). 脂砚斋批评本《红楼梦》. 岳麓书社.
Cao Xueqin曹雪芹. (1981). 脂砚斋重评石头记. 上海古籍出版社.
Deng Suifu邓遂夫. (2000). 脂砚斋重评石头记甲戌校本. 作者出版社.
Ding Gan丁淦. (1996). 脂砚斋辩. 红楼梦学刊, 17(3), 271-298.
Duan Jiangli段江丽. (2019). 红学研究论辩. 辽宁人民出版社.
Gao Shuwei高树伟. (2022). 重论脂砚斋与畸笏叟之关系.中国文化研究, 29(1), 126-139.
Huo Guoling, Huo Jiping, & Huo Lijun霍国玲, 霍纪平, 霍力君. (1997). 红楼解梦. 中国文学出版社.
Li Pei李佩. (2001). 脂砚斋的艺术真实观. 新疆师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 22(1), 63-69.
Liu Xinwu刘心武. (2016). 刘心武揭秘《红楼梦》 (下卷). 译林出版社.
Mei Jie梅节. (2005). 曹雪芹、脂砚斋关系探微. 河南教育学院学报 (哲学社会科学版), 24(96), 40-48,71.
Shi Xiaoqiong施小琼. (2005). 《红楼梦》作者之疑.滁州学院学报, 7(5), 66-68.
Wang Junde, & Sui Guocheng王俊德, 隋国成. (2005). 脂砚斋与《红楼梦》的关系. 福建教育学院学报, 18(5), 73-75.
Wang Liwen王丽文. (2015). 脂砚斋批评本红楼梦. 岳麓书社.
Wang Wujun王吴军. (2016). 脂砚斋是曹雪芹的什么人.文史博览, 17(1), 40-41.
Xiao Fengzhi萧凤芝. (2023). 雪芹、脂砚身世释考——兼论《红楼梦》中几个人物原. 红楼梦学刊, 44(5), 154-175.
Xu Guohua许国华. (2015). 脂砚斋与畸笏叟. 福建教育学院学报, (7), 93-97.
Zhang Baokun张宝坤. (1998). 名家解读《红楼梦》. 山东人民出版社.
Zhou Ruchang周汝昌. (2017). 周汝昌校订批点本《石头记》. 译林出版社.
Zuo Yuncheng左云成. (2017). 曹雪芹、脂砚斋相互融合的修辞观. 东南传播, 36(8), 129-130.