An Analysis of the Discourse Interaction in the Online Classroom of Chinese for Specific Purposes - A Case Study of the Online Teaching of Chinese for Hotel in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Burapha University
Main Article Content
Abstract
In order to better understand the problems of classroom interaction in the online teaching of Chinese for specific purposes, this paper analyzes the online teaching video of the course “Chinese for Hotel” as an example. This course is for the Chinese major of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Burapha University. Based on the discourse interaction theory, ELAN software was adopted to annotate and quantitatively analyze this video from the following three dimensions: teacher talk, student talk and student invalid answers. It was found that the teacher subconsciously gave attention to classroom interaction by, for example, setting display and referential questions, adopting a variety of repair strategies, and giving positive feedback. However, there were also some problems as follows. Firstly, according to the teaching purpose and the level of students, there should be more referential questions. Secondly, in terms of the total number of discourse acts, the total duration of discourse and discourse control, the teacher’s discourse overwhelmingly exceeded the students’. Finally, the organization of classroom activities was mainly based on the interaction between teacher and students, and the form of interaction was not diverse but single. On this basis, this paper gives corresponding teaching suggestions on how to design information gap activities to implement task teaching and to improve students’ output in class.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills for effective teaching: Research-based practice. Routledge.
Long, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger, & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-286). Newsbury House.
Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in second language classroom-oriented research: A critical review. Studies in second language acquisition, 13(2), 249-274.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.
崔希亮. (2020). 全球突发公共卫生事件背景下的汉语教学. 世界汉语教学, 34(3), 291-299.
蒋育忻. (2012). 对外汉语网络教学应用研究 [硕士学位论文]. 山东大学.
金海燕, 司甜, 程红, 王辰, 项英, & 张黎. (2020). 新冠疫情下的汉语国际教育: 挑战与对策[大家谈 (下)]. 语言教学与研究, (5), 1-16.
李丹萌. (2017). 汉语国际教育中线上汉语教学的应用研究 [硕士学位论文]. 郑州大学.
李新颜. (2012). 对外汉语网络教学平台的构建及其运营研究 [硕士学位论文]. 复旦大学.
历楠. (2018). 对外汉语远程网络教学策略研究 [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳大学.
刘虹. (2004). 会话结构分析. 北京大学出版社.
邵明明, & 白乐桑. (2021). 新冠疫情下的汉语国际教育: 挑战与对策 [大家谈 (上)]. 语言教学与研究, (4), 1-11.
时婷婷. (2021). 线上“一对一”汉语教学中的师生互动研究. [硕士学位论文]. 中央民族大学.
孙红娟, & 朱志平. (2021). 泰国酒店业汉语课程设计研究——以帕瓦纳. 菩提坤职业学校为例. 国际中文教育 (中英文).
孙晓红. (2014). 对外汉语班级教学与“一对一”教学对比研究. [硕士学位论文].兰州大学.
王海杰. (2021). 柬埔寨线上汉字教学的教师话语分析 [硕士学位论文]. 北京外国语大学.
王瑞烽. (2020). 疫情防控期间汉语技能课线上教学模式分析. 世界汉语教学, (3), 300-310.
王若曦. (2020). 网络时代学生自主学习能力的培养与评价机制——以融媒体时代下的新闻学专业为例. 新闻研究导刊, (21), 40-41.
王若曦. (2021). 一对一线上汉语教学师生互动的个案研究. [硕士学位论文]. 北京外国语大学.
温晓红. (2012). 汉语作为第二语言的习得与教学. 北京大学出版社.
辛平. (2019). 教学理念视域下的对外汉语教学慕课分析. 高教学刊, (16), 6-9.
薛馨华, & 陈申. (2008). 网络教学的文化环境. 世界汉语教学, (3), 99-104.
闫明度. (2021). 卡尔顿大学孔子学院线上汉语课堂互动情况考察. [硕士学位论文]. 华中师范大学.
晏响玲, & 郑艳群. (2014). 在线师生一对一汉语教学的特点及相关问题. 汉语应用语言学研究, 88-97.
杨一飞. (2021). “汉语国际教育线上教学模式与方法”大家谈. 语言教学与研究, (2), 1-14.
余美瑾. (2017). 翻转课堂教学模式在初级汉语口语课堂教学中的应用. [硕士学位论文]. 吉林华桥外国语学院.
郑艳群. (2015). 新时期信息技术背景下汉语国际教育新思路. 国际汉语教学研究, (2), 26-33.