Comparing Language Learning Strategies of English and Chinese Employed by Tertiary Thai Students

Main Article Content

Woralak Bancha
Sirikhwan Phathairak

บทคัดย่อ

The scope of multilingualism in language learning strategies is currently quite limited. This study aims to address the gap by investigating the language learning strategies used by Thai university students who enrolled in an international program conducted in English (L2) and were also studying Chinese as their third language (L3). The research focuses on comparing the strategies employed for learning English, a West Germanic language in the Indo-European language family, and Chinese, a Sino-Tibetan language. The study surveyed 123 university students in International Business: China from southern Thailand who learned through English and studied Chinese as part of their program. Data were collected using two sets of questionnaires based on the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (Oxford, 1990). Descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the closed-ended questionnaire responses, while descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied to the open-ended questionnaire data. The findings from the closed-ended questionnaire indicated that students frequently used social strategies for learning both languages. However, the open-ended questionnaire responses revealed a preference for cognitive strategies when learning both languages. Despite the linguistic differences between English and Chinese, the findings showed similar learning strategies, with no significant differences at the 0.05 level except for memory strategies (p = 0.00). The study discusses these findings and offers recommendations for language educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Bancha, W. ., & Phathairak, S. . (2025). Comparing Language Learning Strategies of English and Chinese Employed by Tertiary Thai Students. วารสารศิลปศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 25(1), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.64731/jla.v25i1.281377
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Arunreung, A., Wichiranon, S., & Oonwattana, P. (2018). Research report of the study of English language learning strategies of liberal arts students, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. https://repository.rmutp.ac.th/bitstream/handle/123456789/2588/LARTS_61_17.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71–86.

Chansamak, S., & Srisapoom, M. (2022). A Study of English Learning Strategies of the Fourth-Year Students in English Program, Faculty of Education, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Journal of Graduate School, Pitchayatat, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 17(2), 188-196.

Charoento, M. (2017). Individual learner differences and language learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 7(2), 57-72.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In Research methods in education (pp. 440-456). Routledge.

Dmitrenko, V. (2017). Language learning strategies of multilingual adults learning additional languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(1), 6-22.

Edele, A., Kempert, S., & Schotte, K. (2018). Does competent bilingualism entail advantages for the third language learning of immigrant students? Learning and Instruction, 58, 232–244.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Fry, G. W., & Bi, H. (2013). The evolution of educational reform in Thailand: The Thai educational paradox. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 290-319.

Grainger, P. (2012). The impact of cultural background on the choice of language learning strategies in the JFL context. System, 40(4), 483-493.

Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 23-58.

Hapsari, A. (2019). Language learning strategies in English language learning: A survey study. Journal of English Teaching Studies, 1(1), 58-68.

Jaekel, N. (2020). Language learning strategy use in context: The effects of self-efficacy and CLIL on language proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(2), 195-220.

Jessner, U., & Török, V. (2017). 10 strategies in multilingual learning: Opening new research avenues. In S. E. Pfenninger & J. Navracsics (Eds.), Future research directions for Applied Linguistics (pp. 192-211). Multilingual Matters.

Kean, S. (2018). Understanding the Language Learning Strategies of English Language Learners in the Community College System [Master thesis, University of San Diego]. Theses and Dissertations at Digital USD.

Khansir, A. A., Dehkordi, F. G., & Mirzaei, M. (2021). Learning strategies and English language teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(6), 734-741.

Korkmaz, Ş. Ç. (2013). Third language learning strategies of ELT learners studying either German or French. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28-1), 92-104.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Lancho Perea, L. A. (2021). Changes over time in language learning strategy use by foreign language learners. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 39(2), 129-138.

Li, C., Chen, L., Ma, C., Zhang, S., & Huang, H. (2021). Strategy use among Chinese as second language learners in Mainland China from the mediation theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752084

Moeithaisong, M. (2023). A study of English language learning strategies of students at Rajamangala Univeristy of Technology Suvarnabhumi Suphanburi Campus. Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 5(1), 127-140.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic education core curriculum. Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U.(1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. Newbury House Publishers.

Padermprach, N. (2017). The problems of English language education at the upper secondary level in Thailand: The perceptions of Thai EFL teachers and students in Bangkok [Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick]. WRAP: Warwick Research Archive Portal.

Pawlak, M., & Kiermasz, Z. (2018). The use of language learning strategies in a second and third language: The case of foreign language majors. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 427-443.

Prissananuntakul, N., & Chaengchenkit, R. (2017). The survey of language learning strategies of high scoring and low scoring students of an international program in a university [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Digital Collections.

Rubaai, N., Hashim, H., & Yunes, M. A. M. (2019). Identifying English language learning strategies used by Polytechnic students. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Socialesy Humanidades, 4(18), 98-103.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Prentice Hall.

Saez-Fajardo, S. (2023). The language learning strategies of multilinguals: The influence of age of acquisition in early bilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2241484

Saputro, B. D., & Fauziati, E. (2019). Metacognitive strategies used by good students to improve their English achievement: A case study at SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Sambi Boyolali [Doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Saranasathaporn, T. (2017). English learning strategies of Thai learners in the era of Thailand 4.0. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Thonburi University, 11(26), 9-23.

Shi, H. (2017). Learning strategies and classification in education. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1(1), 24-36.

Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318.

Stern, H. H., & Allen, J. P. B. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Sukying, A. (2021). Choices of language learning strategies and English proficiency of EFL university learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 59-87.

Sung, K. Y. (2011). Factors influencing Chinese language learners’ strategy use. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(2), 117-134.

Suwanarak, K. (2015). Learning English as Thai adult learners: An insight into experience in using learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 144-157.

Swaen, B. & George, T. (2024, September 5). What is a conceptual framework?. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/conceptual-framework/

Tanjung, F. Z. (2018). Language learning strategies in English as a foreign language classroom in Indonesian higher education context. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21, 50-68.

Teoh, S. H., Heng, B. C., Neo, Y. F., & Yin, J. T. Y. (2022). Strategies use in Chinese language learning among non-native Chinese language learners in Malaysia. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 2985-3005.

Thongpleaw, P. P., Bunthanatheerachot, N., Phutong, C., & Rattanapinyopast, P. (2022). A study on Chinese vocabulary learning strategies of students majoring in Chinese at Rangsit university. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 24(2), 93-106.

Tieocharoen, W., & Rimkeeratikul, S. (2019). Learning strategies and teaching methods in Thai and Vietnamese universities. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 99-112.

Wattanakamolkul, P., & Praparkarn, P. (2021). A study on Chinese vocabulary learning strategies of undergraduate students majoring in Chinese at Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 44(2), 125-139.

Watthanawelu, N. (2017). The study of learning strategies in Chinese vocabulary for Thai learners in the Chinese language program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani campus. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research in Asia, 23(1), 93-134

Wei, L. (2013). Conceptual and methodological issues in bilingualism and multilingualism research. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 26-51). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch2

Wichitwetchaphaisan, P., Naphaphongkun, S., Chaisaklet, L. (2016). The difference between learning strategies in Japanese language and English language. UTK Research Journal, 10(2), 93-106.

Wu, T. Z. (2023). A Comparative study of the learning strategies of elementary and intermediate-high Chinese learners. Chinese Language and Culture Journal, 10(1), 347-366.

Yang, X., Zeng, L., & Xu, Z. (2021). An investigation of the language learning strategies used by Brazilian students learning Chinese as a foreign language. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e7476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07476

Yuthaphoom, K. & Worawut T. (2023). A study of English language learning strategies of undergraduate students of Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies at Khon Kaen University. Udon Thani Rajabhat University Academic Journal, 11(1), 1-18.

Záborská, D. (2020). [Review of the book Contemporary language motivation theory–60 years since Gardner and Lambert 1959, by A. H. Al-Hoorie & P. D. Maclntyre]. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(2), 118-123.

Zou, B., & Supinda , L. (2022). Oxford’s strategy inventory for language learning: English learning of Chinese students in Thai university. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 705-723.