The State's Management of Religious Hate Speech in the Context of Religious Diversity in Malaysia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present research project on the state's management of religious hate speech in the context of religious diversity in Malaysia is a qualitative research project in which interviews and documentary research comprise the primary and secondary sources of data collection. The results are as follows: 1) The situations of freedom of religion in Malaysia do not correspond to the principles of freedom of expression that are considered universal ethical standards. That is due to the country’s dualistic legal and bureaucratic structures which emphasize the stability of Islam as the official religion of the nation. Precisely, the laws and state agencies that govern and restrict religious practices and propagation discriminate against the adherents of other religions. 2) Given Malaysia’s approach of hate speech restriction by laws, any proposal to apply similar restrictive measures to Muslim communities in Thailand seems to be conceptually and practically problematic. On one hand, it is the imposition of measures that are contradictory to the principles of religious freedom and discriminatory against the religious minorities. On the other hand, the legal and bureaucratic structures of Thailand are not fit for such imposition. 3) In the efforts to prevent and restrict interreligious hate speech, this research has concluded to propose that universal principles of rights and liberty should be the common platform where all parties play on equal terms.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abdullah, M. (2010). Nasib Malayu di Bumi Melayu. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Ahmad, M. (2003). Pengajian Islam. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Ali, S. (2008). Ethnic Relations in Malaysia: Harmony & Conflict. Utusan Malaysia.
Feener, R. M. (2014). Official religions, state secularisms, and the structures of religious pluralism. In J. Finucane & R. M. Feener (Eds.), Proselytizing and the Limits of Religious Pluralism in Contemporary Asia (pp. 1-16). Springer.
India Today. (2019, August 20). Islamic preacher Zakir Naik banned from giving public speeches in Malaysia. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/islamic-preacher-zakir-naik-banned-from-giving-speeches-in-malaysia-1582531-2019-08-20
International Standards – I 1. (n.d.). Freedom of Religion or Belief. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/IStandardsI1.aspx
Lemière, S. (2014). Conversion and Controversy: Reshaping the Boundaries of Malaysian Pluralism. In J. Finucane & R. M. Feener (Eds.), Proselytizing and the Limits of Religious Pluralism in Contemporary Asia (pp. 41-64). Springer.
Malik, M. (2011). Religious Freedom, Free Speech and Equality: Conflict or Cohesion? Res Publica, 17(1), 21-40.
Mårtensson, U. (2014). Hate Speech and Dialogue in Norway: Muslims Speak Back. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(2), 230-248.
Maussen, M., & Grillo, R. (2014). Regulation of Speech in Multicultural Societies: Introduction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(2), 174-193.
Morrell, K. (2012) What Is ‘Public Interest’?: A Case Study. In K. Morrell (Ed.), Organization, Society and Politics (pp. 162-181). Palgrave Macmillan.
Temperman, J. (2011). Freedom of Expression and Religious Sensitivities in Pluralist Societies: Facing the Challenge of Extreme Speech. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2011(3), 729-757.
Woolf, L. M., & Hulsizer, M. R. (2004). Hate groups for dummies: How to build a successful hate-group. Humanity & Society, 28(1), 40-62.