The Implementation of a Poster Conference Activity in Thailand’s EFL Classes: English and Dialogic Teaching Implications for Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to investigate the use of a poster conference as a teaching methodology in EFL classes in Thailand’s universities. Specifically, the study firstly examined how the poster conference was administered in Thai universities’ EFL classes, and secondly examined whether or not it could promote dialogic education and students’ English speaking skills. Qualitative data were collected through classroom observations and interviews among four Thai EFL lecturers and twelve of their students. It was found that in Thailand’s universities the poster conference activity was adopted as group-based assignment size of groups were large, up to 9-10 students/group, and the medium language used during the process of creating a poster and presenting it at the conference was mostly Thai. Findings suggest that the poster conference activity can promote dialogic teaching as it creates multiple ranges of circumstances which require students to talk and interact with their groupmates as well as with their lecturer in a dialogic way. However, the poster conference might not be able to improve Thai students’ oral English communication skills as interactions, talks, questions, and argumentations occurring while students accomplish tasks relevant to the poster are conducted in the students’ native language. The study offers practical insights that lecturers should consider when designing and implementing a poster conference activity as a teaching tool in their English class.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Culture, Dialogue and Learning: Notes on an Emerging Pedagogy. In Mercer N. & Hodgkinson S. (Eds.). Exploring Talk in School. London, UK: Sage Publications, pp.91-114.
______. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th Edition).York: Dialogos.
Chabeli, M.M.(2002). A poster presentation as an evaluation method to facilitate reflective thinking skills in nursing education. Curationis, 25(3), 10-8.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N. & Wegerif, R. (2000). Thinking Together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds Ltd.
Handron, D.S., (1994). Poster presentations: A tool for evaluating nursing students. Nurse Educator, 19(1), 17-19.
Hess, G.R. & Brooks, E.N. (1998). The class poster conference as a teaching tool. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education, 27, 155-158.
Hess, G.R., Tosney, K. & Leigel, L. (2009). Creating effective poster presentations: AMEE Guide no. 40. Medical Teacher, 31, 1-18.
Koshy, S. (2011). Poster presentation: An effective assessment for large communication classes?' in N. Courtney, C. Holtham & C. Nygaard (Eds), Beyond Transmission: Innovations in University Teaching. Libri publishing: UK. pp. 203
Kremer, J. B. (2016). Giving learners a voice: A study of the dialogic ‘Quality’ of three episodes of teacher-learner talk-in-interaction in a language classroom. In D. Skidmore & K. Murakami (Eds.), Dialogic Pedagogy: The Importance of Dialogue in Teaching and Learning (pp. 135–152). Buffalo; Bristol: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Rungwaraphong, P. (2012). The promotion of student autonomy in Thailand tertiary education: lecturers’ perspectives and practices. A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education Victoria University of Wellington.
______. (2017a). Framework for dialogic teaching in English reading class: A practice guide for university lecturers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
______. (2017b). Factors Affecting Students’ Participation in Dialogic Talks in Thailand’s EFL Classes: Students’ Perspectives. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Wegerif, R. (2011). From dialectic to dialogic: A response to Wertsch and Kazak. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice. NJ: Springer.