DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDY OF ‘CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS’ AND ‘DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION’ THEORIES

Authors

  • Ekanart Witchanee Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Civil-Military Relations, Democratic Transition, Modernization Theory, Military Role

Abstract

This academic article aims to examine the origin of concepts‘civil-military relations’ and ‘democratic transition’. By reviewing various literature related to the conceptual framework of the extent of the military’s control over political power. It was found that social conditions under different circumstances caused the different levels of military in political sector and civilian control. Which in turn affects to democratic transition. Thus, this approach, which is applied to the study of the military’s role in the political areas, would extensively build up the existing body of knowledge in the development of a stable and sustainable democracy.

References

ไชยรัตน์ เจริญสินโอฬาร. (2558). อัตวิสัย/วัตถุวิสัยในสังคมศาสตร์/มนุษยศาสตร์. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.

ธนบรรณ อู่ทองมาก. (2560). รัฐราชการไทยภายหลังการรัฐประหาร พ.ศ. 2557 (วิทยานิพนธ์รัฐศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาการปกครอง). กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

พิชญ์ พงษ์สวัสดิ์. (2561). เผด็จการวิทยา. กรุงเทพฯ: มติชน.

สุรชาติ บำรุงสุข. (2558). เสนาธิปไตย : ทหารกับการเมืองไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: มติชน.

Croissant, A. et al. (2013). Democratization and Civilian Control in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dahl, R. A. (2006). A preface to democratic theory. USA: University of Chicago Press.

Finer, S. E. (1975). The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. London: Pall Mall Press.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.

Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Society. London: Yale University Press.

______. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Kohn, R. H. (1997). How democracies control the military. Journal of Democracy, 8(4), 140-153.

Lasswell, H. D. (1941, January). The Garrison State. American Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 455-468.

Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Developmental Studies, 31(3), 400-427.

Linz, J. J. (1990). Transitions to Democracy. The Washington Quarterly, 13(3), 143-164.

Lipset, S. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American political science review, 53(1), 69-105.

Moore, B. (1974). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Great Britain: Penguin University Books.

O’Donnell, G. & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies.

Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337-363.

Schmitter, P. (2010). Twenty-Five Years: Fifteen Findings. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 17-28.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Witchanee, E. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDY OF ‘CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS’ AND ‘DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION’ THEORIES. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 14(2), 224–233. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/285731