DEVELOPMENT OF A WRITING INSTRUCTION PROCESS BASED ON RESPONSETO INTERVENTION AND REFLEXIVE THINKING APPROACH FOR ENHANCING OPINION WRITING ABILITY IN ENGLISH OF UPPER PRIMARY LEVEL PUPILS
Keywords:
Opinion Writing, Response-to-Intervention Approach, Reflexive Thinking Approach, Teaching English WritingAbstract
Objectives of this research were: 1. To develop a writing instructional process based on Response-to-Intervention Approach (RtI) and Reflexive Thinking approach (RT) to enhance the opinion writing ability in English of upper primary school pupils, and 2. To study the effectiveness of the developed writing instructional process. The one-group pretest-posttest design was implemented, and the study used cluster random sampling technique from 30 primary students through 20 weeks’ length. The data collection instruments were parallel opinion writing ability test and analytical rubric scoring. The data were analyzed using mean, the standard deviation and t-test.
The findings of this study revealed that. 1. The writing instructional process based on Response-to-Intervention approach and Reflective Thinking approach consisted of 5 steps: 1) self-assessment, 2) thinking, considering, and planning a task, 3) creating writing task, 4) reflection for improvement, and 5) sharing ideas and cause and effects. 2. In term of the effectiveness of the developed writing instructional process, it was found that the average scores of opinion writing was higher than before the experiment at the 0.05 level of statistically significance. Also, it was found that the average scores of opinions writing ability in English, all components were also higher than pre-test at the 0.05 level of statistically significance, except component 1.1.
References
ชนิศา ตันติเฉลิม. (2560). การตอบสนองต่อการช่วยเหลือ : หลักการ องค์ประกอบสำคัญ และข้อเสนอแนะเชิงปฏิบัติสำหรับส่งเสริมการจัดการศึกษาแบบเรียนรวมในประเทศไทย. วารสารวิธีวิทยาการวิจัย, 30(2), 187-227.
อมรา แสงจันทมณี. (2524). แนวการสอนภาษาเพื่อการสื่อความหมาย. วารสารภาษาปริทัศน์, 1(2), 11-17
Beyreli, L., & Konuk, S. (2018). A Research on The Improvement of Persuasive Writing Skill of Sixth Grade Students in Secondary School. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 42(193), 181-215.
Conway J. (1994). Reflection, the art and science of Nursing and the theory practice gap. British Journal of Nursing, 3(1), 114-118.
Dunn, M. (2012). Response to intervention: Employing a mnemonic-strategy with art media to help struggling writers. Journal of International Education and Leadership. 2(3), 368-386.
Fernández-Díaz, Calvo, & Rodríguez-Hoyos. (2014). Towards a collaborative action research in Spain to improve teaching practice. Educational Action Research, 22(3), 397-410.
Good, Carter V. (1973). Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Guralnik, D. B. (1976). Webster’s New World Dictionary of American Language Ohio: Willam Collins and World Publishing Company.
Herder, A. et al., (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 160-174.
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2013). RP or ‘RIP’: A critical perspective on reflective practice. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 291-315.
Moon, J. (2013). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge Falmer: New York.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential Components of RTI-A Closer Look at Response to Intervention. National Center on Response to Intervention.
Nippold, M., & Fanning, J. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: a study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(2), 38-125.
Pollock, P.H. et al., (2011). Learning through discussions: Comparing benefits of small-group and large-class settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48-64.
Schamber, J., & Mahoney, S. (2000). Assessing and improving the quality of group critical thinking exhibited in the final projects of collaborative learning groups. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 103-137.
Wilson, G. (2011). Evidencing reflective practice in social work education: Theoretical uncertainties and practical challenges. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 154-172.
York-Barr et al., (2006). Reflective practice to improve schools: an action guide for educators. California, USA: Corwin Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of MCU Social Science Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of MCU Journal of Social Sciences. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.