Management of Conflict between People and Government Agency by Approving Energy Project of the Biomass Power Plant at Sikiew District, Nakhonratchasima Province
Keywords:
Management Conflict between People and Government Agency, Energy project of The Biomass Power PlantAbstract
The purpose of this research was to study 1) to study the conflict situation in the construction of a biomass power plant at sikiew district, sikiew prefecture, nakhonratchasima province. 2) to study the role of government agencies in management. 3) Proposed guidelines for the management of conflicts in the construction of biomass power plants in both the national and local levels. A qualitative research study analyzed the phenomenon actually occurs. With in-depth interviews, focus groups, to observe without participating (non-participant observation) of technical documents and reports, including related research. With the primary (Key information) 35 by analyzing data in a systematic way to portray. The interpretation and the conclusion of the phenomenon they discovered is concluded.
1. Communication was the official government agencies. People may not understand the process and details of the information clearly. Including benefits So do not believe in the administration of government. Which has become a point of conflict with the government.
2. The Government agencies failured to manage conflict in approving energy projects. The process of observing a violation of the rights of citizens. Without opportunity for public comment. And a lack of critical processes in the shade. The creation process is awareness. People do not trust and trust in the government. Including the private sector.
3. Avoid the practice of law with the law of the living space. The channel's existing authority to request or permit the operation of power plant .Without strict enforcement. The biomass power plant and caused a lot of impact.
4. Conflict management of the local people against the government agencies in approving energy projects. It comprised the trust of society. And alternative proposals The social space to build trust. The opportunity to participate in the process. The parties agreed and a common goal. The offer various alternative solutions. And to adhere to good governance principles. And corporate social responsibility as a core priority
References
Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation.Journal of the American Planning Association.35 (4)(July): p. 216-224.
Creighton, J. L. (2005, p. 7). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Christopher Moor. (1996, p.60–61). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategic forResolving Conflict. (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Denhardt, Janet V. and Denhardt, Robert B. (2007).The New Public Service :Serving, Not Steering.(Expanded ed).New York: M.E. Sharpe. USA.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
Pateman, Carole. (1970).Participation and Democratic Theory.Cambridge University Press.
Prause, Daria. andMujtaba, Bahaudin G. (2015). Conflict Management Practices for Diverse Workplaces. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly.6 (3) (2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In order to conform the copyright law, all article authors must sign the consignment agreement to transfer the copyright to the Journal including the finally revised original articles. Besides, the article authors must declare that the articles will be printed in only the Journal of MCU Journal of Social Sciences. If there are pictures, tables or contents that were printed before, the article authors must receive permission from the authors in writing and show the evidence to the editor before the article is printed. If it does not conform to the set criteria, the editor will remove the article from the Journal without any exceptions.
