An Analysis of Test Result and Guidelines for Enhancing the Quality of the Sripatum University Test of English Proficiency (SPU-TEP)
Keywords:
Test Item, English Proficiency Test, Higher EducationAbstract
This article consists of three main objectives: (1) to analyze the English proficiency test scores of Sripatum University students, (2) to examine the difficulty levels and discrimination indices of the Sripatum University Test of English Proficiency (SPU-TEP), and (3) to propose approaches for improving the English proficiency test for higher education students. The sample consisted of 220 undergraduate students from Sripatum University, who took the test. Data were collected by the research team and analyzed using basic statistics, item difficulty (p), item discrimination (D), and reliability values. The research findings revealed that (1) The test results of 220 students who took the English proficiency test (SPU-TEP), which consisted of 100 items, revealed that the average score was at a moderate level (M = 68.90, SD = 13.01). When comparing the English proficiency levels with the CEFR, it was found that the majority of students were at the B2 level (42.80%), followed by B1 (37.40%), A2 (6.58%), and A1 (0.82%), respectively. (2) The item difficulty (p) of the SPU-TEP listening section ranged from 0.08 to 0.98, while that of the reading section ranged from 0.27 to 0.95. The item discrimination (D) for the listening section ranged from -0.10 to 0.72, and for the reading section, from -0.11 to 0.71. (3) The suggested approaches for improving the English proficiency test include revising the test structure and content, incorporating more diverse listening formats in the listening section, and adding more analytical and inferential items in the reading section.
References
Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface Between Learning and Assessment. Continuum.
Brown, J. D. (2014). Testing in Language Programs. McGraw-Hill.
Commission on Higher Education Standards. (2024). Announcement of the Commission on Higher Education Standards: Policy on Raising English Proficiency Standards in Higher Education Institutions. Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation (MHESI), Thailand. (in Thai)
Committee for Advancing English Proficiency Standards. (2024). Guidelines for Raising English Proficiency Standards of Students. Bangkok: Sripatum University. (in Thai)
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. [Online]. Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement. (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
English Language Standards Enhancement Steering Committee. (2024). Minutes of the 3rd meeting held on January 18, 2024. Sripatum University. (in Thai)
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1989). Validity of a taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), 51–78.
Kline, P. (2015). A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. Routledge.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education. Springer.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012–1027.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students. 3rd ed. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Office of the Higher Education Standards Committee. (2024). Announcement of the Higher Education Standards Committee on the policy for enhancing English language standards in higher education institutions. Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (in Thai)
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2019). National English proficiency development policy. Bangkok: OHEC.
Sripatum University. (2025). Draft Mapping of SPU-TEP English Proficiency Test Results to the CEFR Framework. Bangkok: School of Liberal Arts, Sripatum University.
Sripatum University. (2024). Strategic plan for student development of Sripatum University (2024–2028). Sripatum University. (in Thai)
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed. Pearson.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Innovation and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
See Publication Ethics https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journalcim/Ethics