An Analysis of Repetition in Barack Obama’s Eulogies

Main Article Content

Sawanee Phakhasun
Rebecca K. Webb

Abstract

This research aims at studying the use of rhetorical devices as a significant component in Barack Obama’s successful public speeches. From various rhetorical devices, this study explores the types, functions, and purposes of repetition in Obama’s eulogies for Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, and Beau Biden III. The study deals with five types of repetition in words, phrases, and clauses: anadiplosis, anaphora, epanalepsis, epistrophe, and polyptoton. Repetition is classified as having four objectives: to create emphasis, to call attention, to appeal to emotion, and to add rhythm. Moreover, to interpret the speaker’s purpose, the five types of illocutionary acts based on John R. Searle (1979) are employed: assertives, directives, commissives, expressives, and declaratives. The results show that from sixty-three samples, anaphora is the most frequently applied to create emphasis. Assertive is the main purpose of the anaphora in selected eulogies. Obama uses anaphora to emphasize a subject, an event, a point, and as a tool to alter the audience’ s mood. Therefore, the use of anaphora in Obama’ s eulogies demonstrates the effect of this rhetorical device on the audience’s emotion and reveals his intention. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phakhasun, S., & Webb, R. K. . (2022). An Analysis of Repetition in Barack Obama’s Eulogies. Journal of Liberal Arts Prince of Songkla University, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14456/jlapsu.2022.1
Section
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

Alreza, E. R., Natsir, M., & Valiantien, N. M. (2019). An analysis of illocutionary acts in Yes, We Can Speech by Barack Obama. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 3(1). doi:10.5281/ilmubudaya.v3i1.1596

Al-Saeedi, H. M. A. (2017). The function of repetition in Trumps inaugural address: A discourse analysis study. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 1(28), 709–732. doi: 10.31185/eduj.vol1.iss28.34

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do thing with words. Clarendon Press.

Corbett, E. P. J. (1965). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. Oxford University Press.

Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Eulogy. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved May 17, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eulogy

Farnsworth, W. (2011). Farnsworth’s classical English rhetoric. David R. Godine.

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2007). Aristotle’s art of rhetoric. In I. Worthington (Ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric (pp. 107-123). Blackwell Publishing.

Ghosal, M., & Murphy, D. M. L. (2014). A study on Aristotle’s rhetoric. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 2(4), 249-255.

Harris, R. A. (2013). A handbook of rhetorical devices. Prestwick House.

Hashim, S. S. M. (2015). Speech acts in political speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5(7), 699–706. doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993) /07.05.2015/008

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Ihsan, M. D. (2018). Repetition values on Martin Luther King Jr. Speech. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 3(2), 178. doi: 10.21070/jees.v3i2.1236

Kennedy, G. A. (1994). A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton University Press.

Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Leech, G. N. (1980). A linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Taping, M. G., Juniardi, Y., & Utomo, D. W. (2017). Rhetorical devices in Hillary Clinton concession speech. Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2). doi: 10.30870/jels.v2i2.2249

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.