The Structural Relationship between Gerotechnology, Functional Rehabilitation and Successful Aging in Place among Older Adults: A Case Study in Phitsanulok Province

Authors

  • Thanet Oonprechavanich Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Phitsanulok University
  • Supapada Phureepong Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Phitsanulok University
  • Suthichai Punyaroj Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Phitsanulok University
  • Ratchanokp Phramsiri Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Phitsanulok University
  • Pramote Sitthijuk Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Phitsanulok University

Keywords:

Gerotechnology, Successful aging in place, Functional Rehabilitation, Phitsanulok

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the direct and indirect influences of technology on the elderly’s happy life at home in Phitsanulok Province, and examine the mediation effect of functional rehabilitation between technology for the elderly and healthy aging. The data were collected by using a questionnaire. The participants were 234 elderly individuals, aged 60 and above, in 9 districts of Phitsanulok, selected by non-probability quota sampling. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and mediation testing with the PROCESS v4.2 (Model 4). The results showed that technology for the elderly had a direct effect on healthy aging at home with a value of 24.60% and functional rehabilitation with a value of 72.30%. Also, functional rehabilitation had a direct effect on healthy aging at home with a value of 61.60%. In addition, technology for the elderly had an indirect effect on healthy aging at home with a value of 44.50%. Finally, functional rehabilitation served as a partial mediating variable between technology for the elderly and healthy aging at home in Phitsanulok.

References

ภรัณยา ปาลวิสุทธิ์, อภินันท์ จุ่นกรณ์, มงคล รอดจันทร์ และศัลยพงศ์ วิชัยดิษฐ. (2568). การพัฒนาแอปพลิเคชั่นสุขภาพผู้สูงอายุในท้องถิ่นด้วยเทคโนโลยีดิจิทัล. วารสารแม่โจ้เทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและนวัตกรรม, 11(1), 86-105.

มนตรี พิริยะกุล. (2562). การวิเคราะห์อิทธิพลการกำกับด้วยโปรแกรม PROCESS. วารสารวิชาการเทคโนโลยีอุตสาหกรรม, 15(2), 144-161.

สำนักงานพัฒนาสังคมและความมั่นคงของมนุษย์จังหวัดพิษณุโลก. (2564). รายงานสถานการณ์ทางสังคม จังหวัดพิษณุโลก ประจำปี 2564. สืบค้น 18 กันยายน 2567, จาก https://www.m-society.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/mso_web/download/article/article_20211110145946.pdf

สำนักงานสถิติจังหวัดพิษณุโลก. (2567). สถิติทางการประเด็นผู้สูงอายุ. สืบค้น 20 กันยายน 2567, จาก https://phitsanulok.nso.go.th/statistical-information-service/key-indicators-of-the-province/percentage-of-the-elderly.html

สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ. (2567). การสำรวจประชากรสูงอายุในประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2567. สืบค้น 19 พฤษภาคม 2568, จาก https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2025/20241209145003_27188.pdf

Aggar, C., Sorwar, G., Seton, C., Penman, O., & Ward, A. (2023). Smart home technology to support older people's quality of life: A longitudinal pilot study. Int J Older People Nurs, 18(1): e12489. https://doi: 10.1111/opn.12489.

Amarilla-Donoso, F. J., López-Espuela, F., Roncero-Martín, R., Leal-Hernandez, O., Puerto-Parejo, L. M., Aliaga-Vera, I., ... & Lavado-García, J. M. (2020). Quality of life in elderly people after a hip fracture: a prospective study. Health and quality of life outcomes, 18, 1-10.

Baragash, R. S., Aldowah, H., & Ghazal, S. (2022). Virtual and augmented reality applications to improve older adults’ quality of life: A systematic mapping review and future directions. Digital health, 8, 20552076221132099.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bar-Tur, L. (2021) Fostering Well-Being in the Elderly: Translating Theories on Positive Aging to Practical Approaches. Front. Med, 8, 517226, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.517226

Bouma, H., Fozard, J. L., Bouwhuis, D. G., & Taipale, V. (2007). Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology, 6(4), 190-216.

Carnemolla, P. (2018). Ageing in Place and the Internet of things–how Smart Home Technologies, the Built Environment and Caregiving Intersect. Visualization in Engineering, 6(1), 1-16.

Chen, K., & Lou, V. W. Q. (2020). Measuring senior technology acceptance: development of a brief, 14-item scale. Innovation in aging, 4(3), 32617418

Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper & Row.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Genge, C., McNeil, H., Debergue, P., & Freeman, S. (2023). Technology to support aging in place: key messages for policymakers and funders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1287486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287486

Guner, H. & Acarturk, C. (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 311-330.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Halicka, K. & Surel, D. (2021). Gerontechnology-new opportunities in the service of older adults. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(3). 114-126

Han S. & Nam S. I. (2022). What's needed to make 'aging in place' for healthy old age. Gerontechnology, 21(s), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2022.21.s.674.pp7

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Huang, G. & Oteng, S. A. (2023). Gerontechnology for better elderly care and life quality: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Ageing, 20(1), 27-39.

Imanishi, M., Tomohisa, H., & Higaki, K. (2017). Impact of continuous in-home rehabilitation on quality of life and activities of daily living in elderly clients over 1 year. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 17(11), 1866-1872

Kabadayi, S., Hu, K., Lee, Y., Hanks, L., Walsman, M., & Dobrzykowski, D. (2020). Fostering older adult care experiences to maximize well-being outcomes: A conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 31(5), 953-977.

Kwon, S. (2016). Gerontechnology: Research, practice, and principles in the field of technology and aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Lahtinen, A., Leppilahti, J., Harmainen, S., Sipilä, J., Antikainen, R., Seppänen, M. L., … & Jalovaara, P. (2015). Geriatric and physically oriented rehabilitation improves the ability of independent living and physical rehabilitation reduces mortality: a randomised comparison of 538 patients. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(9), 892-906.

Lecovich, E. (2014). Aging in place: From theory to practice. Anthropological notebooks, 20(1), 21-32.

Ollevier, A., Aguiar, G., Palomino, M., & Simpelaere, I. S. (2020). How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review. Public health reviews, 41(1), 1-12.

Pattnaik, J. I., Panda, U. K., Samal, B., Das, S., & Ravan, J. R. (2023). Validity of biopsychosocial model of intervention in contemporary medical practice: walking a few extra miles. Journal of Integrative Medicine and Research, 1(2), 74-76.

Peng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Sha, L., Dong, J., & He, Y. (2024). Virtual reality exergames for improving physical function, cognition and depression among older nursing home residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatric nursing, 57, 31-44.

Raymundo, T. M., Lorenzi, L., Huisman, E., Bet, P., Facioli, M. S. B., Medola, F. O., ... & Kort, H. (2024). Ageing in place and dementia: A scoping review identifying preconditions and Gerontechnology participation domains. Gerontechnology, 23(1), 1-13.

Rovinelli, R. J. & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49-60.

Rowe, J. W. & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433-440.

Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Luna, C., & Cook, D. J. (2022). Technologies for health assessment, promotion, and intervention: Focus on aging and functional health. In Positive neuropsychology: Evidence-based perspectives on promoting brain and cognitive health (pp. 111-138). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Schomakers, E. M. & Ziefle, M. (2023). Privacy vs. security: trade-offs in the acceptance of smart technologies for aging-in-place. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(5), 1043-1058.

Sims-Gould, J., Tong, C. E., Wallis-Mayer, L., & Ashe, M. C. (2017). Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(8), 653-663.

Soubutts, E. (2023). Aging in place together: journeys towards adoption and acceptance of smart home healthcare technology. (Doctoral dissertation). United Kingdom: University of Bristol.

Sumner, J., Chong, L. S., Bundele, A., & Wei Lim, Y. (2021). Co-designing technology for aging in place: a systematic review. The Gerontologist, 61(7), e395-e409.

Teasell, R., Salbach, N. M., Foley, N., Mountain, A., Cameron, J. I., Jong, A. D., ... & Lindsay, M. P. (2020). Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; update 2019. International Journal of Stroke, 15(7), 763-788.

Tohit, N. F. M. & Haque, M. (2024). The New Frontier of Ageing: Innovations and Insights in Gerontology. Advances in Human Biology, 14(4), 261-268.

Tsai, H. Y. S., Shillair, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Social support and “playing around” an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 29-55.

Van Rijckevorsel-Scheele, J., Willems, R. C., Roelofs, P. D., Koppelaar, E., Gobbens, R. J., & Goumans, M. J. (2019). Effects of health care interventions on quality of life among frail elderly: a systematized review. Clinical interventions in aging, 2019, 643-658. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S190425

Wade, D. (2016). Rehabilitation–a new approach. Part four: a new paradigm, and its implications. Clinical rehabilitation, 30(2), 109-118.

Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H. C., & Nebeker, C. (2019). Technology to support aging in place: Older adults’ perspectives. In Healthcare, 7(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060.

Welch, V., Mathew, C. M., Babelmorad, P., Li, Y., Ghogomu, E. T., Borg, J., ... & Howe, T. E. (2021). Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: an evidence and gap map. Campbell systematic reviews, 17(3), e1175. https://doi: 10.1002/cl2.1175.

World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. Switzerland: Geneva.

Yeung, P. & Breheny, M. (2021). Quality of life among older people with a disability: The role of purpose in life and capabilities. Disability and rehabilitation, 43(2), 181-191.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Oonprechavanich, T., Phureepong, S., Punyaroj, S., Phramsiri, R., & itthijuk, P. (2025). The Structural Relationship between Gerotechnology, Functional Rehabilitation and Successful Aging in Place among Older Adults: A Case Study in Phitsanulok Province. Journal of Management Science Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 7(3), 82–97. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmspsru/article/view/288657

Issue

Section

Research Articles