The The relationship between corporate governance on participant of chief executive office, board of director, audit committee and earnings smoothness

Authors

  • Panupong Mokthaisong Faculty of Business Administration Saint John University

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Participant, Earning Smoothness.

Abstract

      This study aims to empirically examine the structure of corporate governance on participant and relationship of chief executive office, board of director, audit committee and earnings smoothness. The quantitative method was used 332 companies as instrument for collection data. The instrument of data was being analyzed by using percentages, mean, standard deviation, simple and panel data regression analysis were used to analyze and test research hypotheses.

     The results have shown that corporate governance on participant of duality chief executive officer and the board of director at 67.80 percent. The company’s executives were joined the board of director member at 98.40 percent whereby audit committee on average at 3 persons per company. The empirical study reveals that only audit committee number variable shown positively related with earning smoothness.

Author Biography

Panupong Mokthaisong, Faculty of Business Administration Saint John University

Business Administration Program

References

บรรษัทภิบาลแห่งชาติ. (2554). ความหมายของการกำกับดูแลกิจการ. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 มิถุนายน 2564, จาก http://www.cgthailand.org/SetCG/about/about.html

สมาคมส่งเสริมสถาบันกรรมการบริษัทไทย. (2552). โครงการประกาศเกียรติคุณคณะกรรมการแห่งปี 2551/52. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 มิถุนายน 2564, จาก http://www.thai-iod.com/th/awards.asp

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการกำกับหลักทรัพย์และตลาดหลักทรัพย์. (2560). หลักการกำกับดูแลกิจการที่ดี สำหรับบริษัทจดทะเบียนปี 2560. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 มิถุนายน 2564, จาก http://www.sec.or.th/CGCode

Bagaisa, O.A. and Aljaaidi, K.S. (2020). Corporate governance attributes and firm performance in Saudi Arabia. Accounting, 6, 923–930.

Baxter, P. J. (2007). Audit committees and financial reporting quality. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D., University of Southern Queensland, Queensland.

Black, B.S., Gavalho, A.G.D. and Gorga, E. (2010). Corporate governance in Brazil. Emerging Markets Review, 11, 21-38.

Dechow, P.M. and Dichev, I.D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings : The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement), 35-59.

Henry, D. (2010). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(1), 24-46

Jensen, M.C. (1994). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4(6), 43-58.

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), 305-360.

Martin-Reyna , J.M. S. and. Duran-Encalada, J. A. (2012). The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3, 106–117.

Roslinda, (2009). The relationship between corporate governance and accounting conservatism. Doctoral dissertation Ph.D., The University of New South Wales, New South Wales.

Schipper, K. and Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, Supplement, 97-110.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-13

How to Cite

Mokthaisong, P. (2021). The The relationship between corporate governance on participant of chief executive office, board of director, audit committee and earnings smoothness. Journal of Management Science Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 2(3), 102–113. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmspsru/article/view/254151

Issue

Section

Research Articles