Quality Assurance Indicators to Innovative Organizational of Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • kullaphat kullachartdilok Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin
  • Amornrat Panngam Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin
  • Somjai Suebsor Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin

Keywords:

Indicators, Quality Assurance, Innovative Organization

Abstract

This research article is 1) to analyze and synthesize the history of quality assurance for educational innovation organizations of higher education institutions. 2) create quality assurance for educational innovation organizations of higher education institutions. 3) to evaluate opinions and recommendations. There is still quality assurance for the educational innovation organization of higher education institutions. It is a combined method research study. Theoretical concepts regarding various educational quality assurance systems, including elements and factors affecting being an organization of educational innovation. The sample used in this research Obtained from specific selection according to a group of experts, providing information related to higher education institutions, technology development and innovation promotion groups. According to the Ministerial Regulations on Grouping of Higher Education Institutions, B.E. 2021 There were 21 people. The tools used in the research were interviews and opinion questionnaires, four psychological attitude measurement options, and data were analyzed by averaging. Standard deviation, difference between the mode and median and interquartile range. The results of the research found that the indicators for quality assurance of educational innovation organizations of higher education institutions Consisting of 16 elements, 83 indicators have importance at the highest level and are appropriate and consistent with every indicator, arranged in order of the overall average score from highest to lowest. 1) Innovative teaching curriculum and student assessment 2) Innovation strategy 3) Technology and information innovation 4) Innovative Leadership 5) Innovative operations 6)Quality assurance innovations 7) Student , Customer and stakeholders 8) Facilities and Infrastructure 9) workforce development innovation 10) Academic Servicing 11) Risk management 12) knowledge management 13) marketing and public relations 14) innovation results 15) research and 16) Preserve of Arts and Culture.

References

Anthaveesin, A., Kandecharak, S., Kanchanawong, S. (2018). The Relationship Modelbetween Internal Education Quality Assurance for Performance Excellenceandthe Effectiveness of Private Higher EducationInstitutions in Thailand. Christian University Journal, 24(1), 55-70.

ASEAN University Network (AUN). (2020). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level Version 4.0. Bangkok: ASEAN Univsrsity Network.

Ministerial Regulations on Grouping of Higher Education Institutions, B.E. 2021. (2021) Royal Gazette. Volume 138, Section 21 A., Page 2.

Office of the Education Council Ministry of Education. (2019). National Education Standards 2018. Bangkok: 21 CENTURY CO., LTD.

Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2015). Internal Education Quality Assurance Manual Higher Education level 2014. Bangkok: Office of the Higher Education Commission.

Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2021). Education Criteria for Performance Excellence 2020 – 2023. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Public Company Limited.

Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2022). The Higher Education Plan for the. Production and Development of Manpower of the Country B.E. 2021-2027, Revised Edition. B.E. 2023-2027. Bangkok: Strategy and Planning Division.

Prapidokkosol(Pramoth Pamotito). (2019). An Analysis of the Threefold Training as EducationalInnovation. Journal of Graduate Studies Review, 15(2), 44-55.

Rattanarumitsorn,T. and Teerawattanakul. P. (2019). The future of Thai universities in the 21st century. Retrieved December 4, 2021, from https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/blogs/columnist/122543.

Rojanatrakul, T. (2020). The Development of an Innovative Organization Model of Rajabhat University in Thailand. School of Administrative Studies Academic Journal, 3(2), 1-17.

Setthasin, S. (2023). Institutional and Programmatic Accreditation. Promoting and upgrading the quality of higher education, Bangkok: Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation.

United Nations Population Fund. (2019). The International Conference on Population and Development. Bangkok: UNFPA.

Worapongpat, N., Wachirawongpaisarn, S., Phakamach, P., Chaisirithanya, K. (2021). A Study of the Elements of the Development of Vocational Education Institutions in the Eastern Region of Thailand to be an Educational Innovative Organization in the Digital. Social Science Journal, 10(2), 20-35.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-28

How to Cite

kullachartdilok, kullaphat, Panngam, A., & Suebsor, S. (2025). Quality Assurance Indicators to Innovative Organizational of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of MCU Buddhapanya Review, 10(2), 672–689. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmbr/article/view/272344

Issue

Section

Research Articles