Developing the Guidelines of Academic Administration based on Modern Educational Technology to Enhance Art Education in Guizhou Education University, China
คำสำคัญ:
Academic administration, Modern educational technology, Art educationบทคัดย่อ
The objectives of this research were 1) to investigate problems and needs to improve art education and 2) to develop the academic administration guidelines to enhance art education. The respondents in this research were 286 students and 30 teachers obtained through stratified random sampling at Guizhou Education University. The research instrument employed in this study was a questionnaire. The data analysis employed percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research findings indicated that 1) problems and needs to improve art education based on modern educational technology in student opinion were at high level (Mean = 3.71 S.D. = 1.36) that consisted of art classroom feels disconnected from reality, art classes that integrate technology, learning and artistic comprehension. Regarding teacher perspectives were at high level (Mean = 3.58 S.D. = 1.34) that consisted of integrating technology into higher education's art classrooms and teacher-student interaction. 2) The academic administration guidelines to improve art education comprised of five units 2.1) applying technology in classroom, 2.2) applying technology in school management, 2.3) applying technology in art curriculum, 2.4) applying technology in painting and creative drawing, and 2.5) promoting teacher-student interaction. The 3 specialists evaluated the completeness and correctness of the academic administration guidelines and possessed IOC values from 0.67 to 1.00 meaning that the developed academic administration guidelines were suitable to enhance scholastic achievement of college students.
Downloads
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Amwiine, H. & Nnenna, U. J. (2024). “The Future of Art Education: Integrating Technology and Traditional Practices.” Research Output Journal of Education. 3(1) : 5-7.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika. 16(3) : 297–334.
Duan, W. (2019). “Research on the application of online learning space for college teachers in the context of "Education Informatization 2.0 Action Plan.” Henan Education (Higher Education). (7) : 20-31.
Krejcie, R.V., & D.W. Morgan. (1970). “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.” Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30(3) : 607–610.
Ministry of Education. (2019). “CPC Central Committee and State Council issue China Education Modernization 2035.” New Education. (7) : 27-35.
Muzyka, O. and others. (2024). “Art Education in the Context of the Modern Educational Process.” Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. 55(1) : 1414–1420.
Pan, L., Gu, Q., Dong, Z., & Wang, X. (2005). “Discussion on the construction of teaching evaluation system in higher art colleges.” Shandong Social Science. (7) : 28-33.
Shi, J. (2005). “Modern educational technology and the management of art education in colleges and universities.” Journal of Zhejiang Normal University : Social Science Edition. 30(6) : 119-120.
Srisa-ard, B. (2002). Basic Research. Bangkok : Suveeriyasarn.
Sun, L., Liu, S., & Li, M. (2019). “China's Education Informatization Development Scenario for 2035* - A Picture Based on China's Education Modernization 2035.” China Electronic Education. (8) : 1-8.
Wang, A., & Li, N. (2019). “Art Education in Colleges and Universities : Exploration and Prospect of "Art and Technology" Specialization.” Design. 4(5) : 41-55.
Wei, L. (2016). “Reflections on the Quality Evaluation System and Operation Mechanism of Undergraduate Programs in Fine Arts Disciplines.” Art Education. (3) : 144-145.
Xie, H., & Zhou, Y. (2021). “Exploring the path of deep integration of information technology and education teaching in applied undergraduate colleges and universities.” Journal of Heihe College. 12(3) : 95-97.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics : An introductory Analysis. 2nd ed. New York : Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated.





