Liberal democracy is the key to world peace

Main Article Content

apiradee jiropas


 Since the Cold War ended, democratization has spread across the globe - with many states adapting the ideology as their main political regime. Since their turning to liberal democracy, there have been no wars among the liberal democratic states. This points out that liberal democracy has potential to maintain world peace and can provide significant explanations to counter the realists’ belief that liberal democratic notions of peace are flawed. The Iraq war was an exception because it was not a war between liberal democratic states, but one waged against an illiberal state.
Nevertheless, there are two main weaknesses in this notion of overall suitability: These are how liberal states deal with illiberal states, and the dominant influence of the U.S. in the decision to wage war. Thus, the purpose of this article is to argue the possibility of liberal democracy as a regime to create world peace.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
jiropas, apiradee. (2019). Liberal democracy is the key to world peace. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Suratthani Rajabhat University, 11(3), 214–231. Retrieved from
Academic Articles


Aljazeera. (2019). Trump pledges to hit Taliban 'harder' as peace talks 'dead'. [Online]. Retrieved from [2019, October 9] (n.d.). Liberal Democracy. [Online]. Retrieved from http:// [2018, Dec 20].

Berovitch, J. (1996). Democracy and International conflict: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition by James Lee Ray. International Affairs. 72(3), 563

Cohen, S. (1988-1989). The significance of “In the name of civil liberties”. Law and Philosophy. 7(3), 375-394.

Doyle, W.M. (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. New York: Norton

Gleditsch, N.P. (1992). Democracy and Peace. Journal of peace research. 29(4), 369-376.

Kazmir, M., & Bell, B. (2019). Barack Obama Understands Democracy. [Online]. Retrieved from

barack-obama-understands-democracy/ [2019, October 9].

Lebow, R. (2007). Classical Realism. International Relations Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lisa, M. (2007). Neoliberalism. International Relations Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.

McCurry, A.J. (1967). The Quasi-war: The politics and diplomacy of the undeclared war with france,1797-1801 by Alexander De Conde. The journal of American history. 54(2), 397-398.

Mousseau, M. (1997). Democracy and militarized interstate collaboration. Journal of peace research. 34(1), 73-87.

Mousseau, D.Y. (2001). Democratizing with ethnic divisions: A source of conflict?. Journal of Peace research. 38(5), 547-567.

Owen, J.M. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security. 19(2), 87-125

Panke, D., & Risse, T. (2007). Liberalsim. International Relations Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rhodes, E. (2003). The imperial logic of Bush liberal agenda. Survival. 45(1), 131-154.

Rosato, S. (2003). The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. The American Political Science Review. 97(4), 585-602.

Schweller, R.L. (1992). Domestic structure and preventive war: Are democracies more pacific?. World Politics 44(2), 235-269

Spiro, D.E. (1994). The insignificance of the liberal peace. International Security. 19(2), 50-86.

Squassnoni, S. (2006, Sep). Iran’s nuclear program: recent development. [Online]. Retrieved from [2018, December 16]

Starr, H. (1997). Democracy and Integration: Why don’t fight each other. Journal of peace research. 34(2), 153-162.

The Nobel Peace Prize. (2009). The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009. Retrieved from [2019, October 9].

The Whitehouse. (2002, January). President delivers State of the union Address. Retrieved from [2018, December, 20].

The Whitehouse. (2002, June). President Bush delivers Graduation speech at West point. [Online]. Retrieved from 20020601-3.html [2018, December 20].