Organizational Well-Being Model and Work-Life Integration: A Study of Female Faculties and Staff in Women’s Colleges and Universities in China
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study aimed to study the Organizational Well-being and the relationship between Organizational Well-being and Work-life Integration of female faculties and staff in Women’s Colleges and Universities in China and propose an Organizational Well-being Model for Work-life Integration of female faculties and staff in Women’s Colleges and Universities in China. The research is used quantitative and qualitative methodologies to analyze the complex interconnections between these workplace factors by incorporating structural equation modeling (SEM), in-depth interviews, and a focus group. 400 valid survey responses were collected and analyzed using SPSS and AMOS, ensuring the reliability and validity of the research instruments through Cronbach’s Alpha, Composite Reliability, and Average Variance Extracted. The study identifies OWB as a critical factor influencing job satisfaction and engagement, facilitating a better work-life balance among faculty members and staff.
The research findings confirm that Work-Life Integration is significantly influenced by Organizational Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Employee Engagement, with Employee Engagement having the strongest impact. The structural equation WI = 0.361·OWB + 0.329·JS + 0.413·EE + ε supports these relationships, highlighting the importance of engagement in promoting a sustainable work-life balance.
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2011). The job demands–resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), a974.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79–94.
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., & Walters, S. (2002). Opportunities to work at home in the context of work–life balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1), 54–76.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2012). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of work–family integration (pp. 165–183). Academic Press.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139–149.
Maarif, M. S., Affandi, J., Ramaditya, M., & Sukmawati, A. (2022). Reinventing talent management: How to maximize performance in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–13.
McDonald, P., & Bradley, K. A. (2005). Explanations of the provision–utilisation gap in work–life policy. Women in Management Review, 20(1), 1–40.
Morris, M. L., & Madsen, S. R. (2007). Advancing work–life integration in individuals, organizations, and communities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 439–454.
Mukhtar, F. (2012). Work–life balance and job satisfaction among faculty at Iowa State University [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University].
Pichler, F. (2009). Determinants of work–life balance: Shortcomings in the contemporary measurement of WLB in large-scale surveys. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 449–469.
Purwana, D., Arief, N. R., & Saptono, A. (2021). Effect of quality of work life (QWL) and work–life balance on job satisfaction through employee engagement as intervening variables. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 3(1), 259–269.
Yadav, A., Pandita, D., & Singh, S. (2022). Work–life integration, job contentment, employee engagement and its impact on organizational effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(3), 509–527.
