Factors Affecting Teachers’ Intention to Undertake Sexuality Education in Universities in Guangdong Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the factors influencing university teachers’ intention to implement sexuality education in Guangdong Province, China, in response to increasing societal attention and policy support for comprehensive sex education. Using a quantitative research approach, data were collected from 357 in-service university teachers through a structured questionnaire, and analyzed via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results indicate that both external environmental factors—such as policy backing, social recognition, and institutional support—and internal factors—namely teachers’ knowledge and attitudes—have significant positive effects on perceived usefulness and teaching intention. Furthermore, perceived usefulness plays a partial mediating role between these factors and teachers’ implementation intention. The model demonstrated good fit indices (CFI=0.991, RMSEA=0.024), confirming the validity of the hypothesized pathways. These findings highlight the importance of providing continuous policy support, cultivating an inclusive school environment, and offering targeted professional training. Strengthening perceived usefulness can effectively enhance teachers’ engagement in sexuality education and contribute to the sustainable implementation of such programs within higher education settings.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Chow, S., & Liu, X. (2012). Evaluating teachers' perception of sexuality education. Health Education Journal,71(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896912443122
Cunha-Oliveira, C., et al. (2021). Knowledge structures and teaching methods in sexuality education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/ 10.17583/ijep.2021.6785
David, B., & Aruta, S. (2022). Support and barriers for sexuality education. Sex Education and Society.
Evans, R. W., Avery, P. G., & Pederson, P. V. (2000). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on teaching social issues. The Clearing House, 73(5), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009600973
Miedema, E., et. al. (2020). Interactive methods in sexuality education. Education Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896920915960
Swanepoel, M., et al. (2017). Impact of teacher attitudes on sexuality education. African Journal of Health Education, 15(1), 612. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v15i1.612
Tan, X., & Tasir, Z. (2024). Students' acceptance towards small private online course: A case study in one of Chinese universities. KW Publications, 14(5), 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.6007/ IJARBSS/v14-i5/21666
Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2020). Comprehensive sexuality education. In I. Vanwesenbeeck (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.205
Zulu, P., & others (2019). Ethical and social norms in sexuality education. Journal of Social Health, 18, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1023-1