Factors influencing students' learning willingness in online art classroom of Chengdu Private University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
In this study, students majoring in art design who participated in online art classes in Chengdu Private University were selected as research objects to study the factors influencing students' willingness to learn behavior. The factors studied in conceptual framework included perceived usefulness (PU), performance expectancy (PE), behavioral intention (BI), satisfaction(SA), self-efficacy (SE), social influence (SI), as well as perceived behavioral control (PBC). Research design, data and methodology: After data collection, 512 questionnaires were collected and after review for validation, 500 questionnaires remain for the data analysis. Purposive sampling and quota sampling were used in the sampling procedures. Before the data gathering, the content validity and reliability of questionnaire was tested by Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) and pilot test (n=30). After the data collection, the Structural equation model (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are used in combination to verify the verification hypothesis and goodness of fit of the model studied. Results: According to the seven hypotheses, it is found that the main factor affecting students' willingness is the perceived behavioral control (PBC).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. PRENTICE-HALL.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.
Aşkar, P., & Aysun, U. M. A. Y. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(21). 1-8.
Arbaugh, B. (2002). Managing The On-Line Classroom: A Study of Technological and Behavioral Characteristics of Web-Based MBA Courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(2), 203-223
Alshammari, S.H. (2020). The Influence of Technical Support, Perceived Self-Efficacy, And Instructional Design on Students’ Use of Learning Management Systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 21(3), 112-141.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY Freeman.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, pplications, and Programming, 2nd ed. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 107(2), 238–246. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & education, 59(3), 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
Cheng, Y. M. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact?. Education+ Training, 61(4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-09-2018-0203
Chiou, J.S., & Shen, C.C. (2012), The Antecedents of Online Financial Service Acceptance: The Impact of Physical Banking Services on Internet Banking Acceptance. Behavior and Information Technology, 31(9), 859-871
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of marketing for higher education, 10(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01
Elkaseh, A., Wong, K., & Fung, C. (2016). Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of Social Media for e-Learning in Libyan Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192-199.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2). 177-189.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA Press.
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4), 300-317.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Prentice Hall.
Jaiyeoba, O., & Iloanya, J. (2019). E-learning in tertiary institutions in Botswana: apathy to adoption. The International Journal Of Information And Learning Technology, 36(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-05-2018-0058
Joreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343
Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education Students in Thailand. International Journal of The Computer, the Internet and Management, 17(3), 361-368.
Jing, W. (2021). On the Importance of Studio System in the Construction of Practical Ability Training Mode of Animation Talents in Colleges and Universities. Modern Vocational Education, 50(1), 10-11.
Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Gender differences in the use of laptops in higher education: A formative analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FEC.44.3.f
Kaplan, David (2009). Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Press.
Leung, C. C., Lam, T. H., & Cheng, K. K. (2020). Mass masking in the COVID-19 epidemic: people need guidance. Lancet, 395(10228), 945.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z. (2006). Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: self-identity theory perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2-3), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1145/1161345.1161355
McConatha, D., Praul, M., & Lynch, M. J. (2008). Mobile learning in higher education: An empirical assessment of a new educational tool. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 7(3), 15-21.
Mazman, S. G., Usluel, Y. K., & Çevik, V. (2009). Social influence in the adoption process and usage of innovation: Gender differences. International Journal of Behavioral, Cognitive, Educational and Psychological Sciences, 1(4), 229-232.
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Impact of Adolescent Drug Use and Social Support on Problems of Young Adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.97.1.64
Osman, I., Maâ, M., Muda, R., Husni, N. S. A., Alwi, S. F. S., & Hassan, F. (2019). Determinants of Behavioural Intention Towards Green Investments: The Perspectives of Muslims. International Journal of Islamic Business, 4(1), 16-38.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543066004543
Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.007
Reychav, I., Dunaway, M., & Kobayashi, M. (2015). Understanding mobile technology-fit behaviors outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 87, 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.005
Rashwan, N. (2021). Some Notes on The Sample Size Determination. Tanta University Press.
Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H., Al-Manthari, B., & Bourdoucen, H. (2018). Toward educational requirements model for mobile learning development and adoption in higher education. TechTrends, 62(6), 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0331-4
Segars, A., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/249590
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, F. (2020). ‘School’s out, but class’ on’, the largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during The COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best evid chin edu, 4(2), 501-519. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555520
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-efficacy in changing societies, 1(1), 202-231. https://doi.org/10.1017/ cbo9780511527692.009