Investigating News Writers’ Engagement in Reporting Gender-based Contents towards Female and LGBTQ Politicians of Thai Political Discourse in Press: An Appraisal Analysis

Main Article Content

Atichat Rungswang
Pattamawan Jimarkon

บทคัดย่อ

This study aims at investigating the engagement of news writers in reporting gender-based content towards both female and LGBTQ politicians in the press in Thailand. The data were 39 clause complexes containing both female or LGBTQ politician as an actor and units of evaluation of gender and sexual orientations. They were collected from two online mainstream English-language newspapers: Bangkok Post and Khaosod. The period of data collection was May 2019 - December 2021. Engagement domain under Martin and White (2005)’s Appraisal Theory was employed as an analytical framework. The findings reveal that attribute under dialogic expansion domain was employed the most (32 times) in expressing performative evaluations towards female and LGBTQ politicians. This suggests that the writers were distancing from their responsibility for what they said. The findings also shed light on the writing strategies used for content creator.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rungswang, A., & Jimarkon, P. (2023). Investigating News Writers’ Engagement in Reporting Gender-based Contents towards Female and LGBTQ Politicians of Thai Political Discourse in Press: An Appraisal Analysis. วารสารนวัตกรรมการศึกษาและการวิจัย, 7(2), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.14456/jeir.2023.33
บท
บทความวิจัย

References

American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients. American Psychologist, 67(1), 10–42.

American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832-864.

Aungsuwan, W. (2017). A Corpus-Informed Study of Media Attitudes Using the Appraisal Framework: An Analysis of Newspaper Reports on Two Opposing Politicians during the 2013-2014 Political Unrest in Thailand (Doctoral dissertation). Thammasat University.

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Bednarek, M. & Caple, H. (2012). Value added: Language, image and news values. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(2), 103-113.

Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and language. London: Longman.

Coupland, N. (2007), Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crawford, C. B. (1994). Effects of sex and sex role on same-sex touch. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 391-394.

Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112,106-124.

Duck, S., & Wright, P. H. (1993). Reexamining gender differences in friendship: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709-727.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power. London: Routledge.

Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397-406.

Freed, A.F. & Greenwood, A. (1996).Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference?. Language in society, 1-26.

Ginevra, M. C., & Nota, L. (2017). Occupational gender stereotypes and problem-solving in Italian adolescents. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(3), 312-327.

Hall, J. A., & Vecchia, E. M. (1990). More "touching" observations: New insights on men, women, and interpersonal touch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1155-1162.

Hall, S., Crichter, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging the state, and law and order. London: MacMillan.

Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 657-674.

Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135.

Heilman, M.E. and Parks-Stamm, E.J. (2007). Gender Stereotypes in the Workplace: Obstacles to Women's Career Progress. Correll, S.J. (Ed.) Social Psychology of Gender (Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 24), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Hill, S. E. & Flom, R. (2007). 18- & 24-month-olds’ discrimination of gender-consistent and inconsistent activities. Infant Behavior and Development, 30, 168–173.

Ji, P. Y., Lapan, R. T. & Tate, K. (2004). Vocational interests and career efficacy expectations in relation to occupational sex-typing beliefs for eight grade students. Journal of Career Development, 31(2), 144–154.

Kandido-Jakšić, M. (1995). Polne uloge i mentalno zdravlje [Gender roles and mental health]. Psihologija, 28, 3-4.

Kerrigan, P. & Pramaggiore, M. (2021) Homoheroic or homophobic? Leo Varadkar, LGBTQ politics and contemporary news narratives. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 38(2), 107-126.

Kinney, T. A., Smith, B. A. & Donzella, B. (2001). The influence of sex, gender, self-discrepancies, and self-awareness on anger and verbal aggressiveness among U.S. college students. Journal ofSocialPsychology,141,245-276.

Kittiteerasack, P. & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Definitional issues in the study of sexual/gender diversity among sexual/gender minority populations in Thailand. The Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health, 31(2), 1-15.

Klein, F., Sepekoff, B. & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multivariable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1–2), 35–49.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper&Row Publishers, Inc.

Lemus, D.S., Moya, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Bukowski, M. (2014). Men in the office, women in the kitchen? Contextual dependency of gender stereotype activation in Spanish women. Sex roles, 70(11-12), 468-478.

Llanos, B. & Nina, J. (2011). Election coverage from a gender perspective: A media monitoring manual. Stockholm: UN Women.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1967). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Matheson, D. (2005). Media discourses: Analysing media texts. London: Open University Press.

Miller, L. & Hayward, R. (2006). New Jobs, old occupational stereotypes: Gender and jobs in the new economy. Journal of Education and Work, 19(1), 67–93.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave: Houndmills.

Shively, M. G. & De Cecco, J. P. (1977). Components of sexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 3(1), 41–48.

Shuy, D. (1969). A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication. London: Routledge.

Sriwimon, L. (2015). The discursive representation of the identities of the first female prime minister of Thailand in the press (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.

Sriwimon, L., & Zilli, P. J. (2017). The sister, the puppet, and the first female PM: Gender Stereotypes in Thai politics are generated in the press, The Journal of South East Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities, 9(1), 1-24.

Talbot, M. (2007). Media Discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Thomas, L., Wareing, S., Singh, I., Peccei, S. J., Thornborrow, J. & Jones, J. (2004). Language, society and power. London: Routledge.

Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 974-985.

Trask, L. (2019). Scare quote. Retrieved November, 21, 2021, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/ informatics/punctuation/quotes/scare

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

White, P. R. R. (2015). Appraisal Theory. In K.Tracy (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.