กลไกการพัฒนาสุขภาวะในสถานศึกษา สังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษามัธยมศึกษาขอนแก่น

Abstract

          This research aimed to: 1) study and examine components and indicators of well-being for schools through content analysis from interviews with three experts; 2) validate the congruence of the well-being indicator model with empirical data using a 5-point rating scale questionnaire (with reliability coefficient of 0.978) from a sample of 360 administrators and teachers selected through multi-stage sampling; and 3) develop and evaluate a Mechanism for developing workplace well-being for schools by interviewing five experts to draft the mechanisms and assess their suitability, feasibility, and utility with five experts. The study employed a mixed-methods research design with a multi-phase approach. The research findings revealed that:
          1) The study and verification of components and indicators of well-being in schools identified four main components with 13 indicators: 1) Organizational Relationships, comprising 4 indicators: self and others understanding, participation, effective communication, and trust; 2) Positive Work Environment and Atmosphere, comprising 3 indicators: space design, environmental management, and workplace safety; 3) Professional Growth, comprising 3 indicators: career advancement, recognition, and professional skill development; and 4) Work-Life Balance, comprising 3 indicators: time management, work efficiency, and life satisfaction.
          2) The validation of the well-being indicator model for schools under the secondary educational service area office Khon Kaen showed consistency with empirical data, as evidenced by the following fit indices: Chi-square = 40.452, degrees of freedom = 28, p-value = 0.0602, GFI = 0.990, RMSEA = 0.035, SRMR = 0.017, CFI = 0.997, and TLI = 0.992.
          3) The development mechanism for enhancing well-being in schools under the secondary educational service area office Khon Kaen consisted of 10 factors influencing development, 8 conditions for development, and 8 development processes. The evaluation results showed that the mechanism had very high suitability (= 4.86, S.D. = 0.35), high feasibility (= 4.42, S.D. = 0.55), and very high utility (= 4.89, S.D. = 0.32).