thailand Thailand’s Role in Promoting Maritime Security in ASEAN: A Case Study of Maritime Overlapping Claims Management with Cambodia in the Koh Kut Area
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates Thailand’s role in promoting maritime security within ASEAN, focusing on managing overlapping maritime claims with Cambodia in the Koh Kut area. The research aims to analyze Thailand’s policies, assess their impact on ASEAN maritime security, and propose strategies for peaceful dispute resolution. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and expert interviews, the study applies thematic content analysis to identify key trends and challenges. Findings highlight Thailand’s emphasis on regional cooperation, joint resource management, and adherence to international legal frameworks such as UNCLOS. However, challenges include political instability, differing boundary interpretations, and limited interagency coordination. Insights from successful cases like the Thailand-Malaysia Joint Development Area underscore the need for transparent governance and equitable resource-sharing. The study recommends fostering trust through transparency, promoting joint development, and aligning national strategies with ASEAN frameworks to enhance sustainable maritime security.
Article Details
References
Amer, R. (2014). China, Vietnam, and the South China Sea: Disputes and dispute management. Ocean Development & International Law, 45(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2013.839160
Bateman, S., Ho, J., & Chan, J. (2009). Good order at sea in Southeast Asia. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
Beckman, R. (2013). The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the maritime disputes in the South China Sea. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0142
Beckman, R. (2021). Maritime disputes in Southeast Asia: Legal frameworks and regional governance. NUS Press.
Department of Marine and Coastal Resources. (2021). Seas, oceans, and national maritime interests. https://www.dmcr.go.th/detailLib/5094
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press.
Djalal, H. (2001). Indonesia and the South China Sea initiative. Ocean Development & International Law, 32(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320151100226
Emmers, R. (2010). Geopolitics and maritime territorial disputes in East Asia. Routledge.
Goh, E. (2019). The Indo-Pacific in US strategy: Responding to power shifts. East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore.
Han, D. G. X. (2017). China’s normative power in managing South China Sea disputes. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 10(3), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox002
National Defence Studies Institute. (2021). Policy proposals for balancing maritime influence. https://www.rtni.navy.mi.th/upload/pdf/Article2564/028.pdf
National Security Council of Thailand. (2015). Joint Technical Committee guidelines. https://www.nsc.go.th
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2021). Feasibility study on maritime transport connectivity between the Gulf of Thailand and Andaman Sea. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?filename=index&nid=14698
Pomeroy, R., Parks, J., & Balboa, C. (2015). Improving marine fisheries management in Southeast Asia: Results of a regional fisheries stakeholder analysis. Marine Policy, 61, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.002
Schofield, C., Lee, S., & Kwon, M.-S. (Eds.). (2014). The limits of maritime jurisdiction. Brill Nijhoff.
Schofield, C., Townsend-Gault, I., Beckman, R., Davenport, T., & Bernard, L. (Eds.). (2013). Beyond territorial disputes in the South China Sea: Legal frameworks for the joint development of hydrocarbon resources. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Srimuangkanjana, C. (2016). Policies and approaches for managing Thailand’s maritime security. https://www.parliament.go.th/ewtadmin/ewt/parliament_parcy/ewt_dl_link.php?filename=house2554&nid=51751
