ENVIRONMENTAL PERCEPTION AND BEHAVIORAL ATTITUDES ON SOCIAL NORMS AMONG LOCAL FOOD PRODUCT CONSUMERS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to 1) test the goodness-of-fit of a structural equation model that examines the relationships among environmental perception, behavioral attitudes, and social norms of local food consumers; 2) investigate the influence of environmental perception on social norms, and 3) examine the influence of behavioral attitudes on social norms of local food consumers. This research is a quantitative study, employing a questionnaire as a data collection tool from a sample of 228 local food consumers in Kalasin Province, selected through convenience sampling which is a non-probability sampling method. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency and percentage, to describe the general characteristics of the sample. In addition, for testing the research model, inferential statistics were applied, including confirmatory factor analysis to examine the fit of the measurement model and structural equation modeling to assess the causal relationships among variables. The results revealed that the structural equation model showed a good fit with the empirical data, with the fit indices falling within acceptable ranges. Environmental perception and behavioral attitudes had positive and statistically significant influences on social norms. Therefore, this leads to a trend toward more responsible and environmentally conscious consumption of local food products at the community level. In summary, promoting environmental perception and behavioral attitudes toward local food products plays an important role in shaping social norms that support consumption behavior, and consequently, which in turn leads to the development of local products and contributes to the sustainability of local communities in Thailand
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Ali, M., Ullah, S., Ahmad, M. S., Cheok, M. Y., & Alenezi, H. (2023). Assessing the impact of green consumption behavior and green purchase intention among millennials toward sustainable environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 23335–23347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23811-1
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
Bhatti, S. H., Saleem, F., Murtaza, G., & Haq, T. U. (2022). Exploring the impact of green human resource management on environmental performance: The roles of perceived organizational support and innovative environmental behavior. International Journal of Manpower, 43(3), 742–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0215
Bingenheimer, J. B. (2019). Veering from a narrow path: The second decade of social norms research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.012
Botetzagias, I., Dima, A. F., & Malesios, C. (2015). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022
Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2018). Theory and practice of social norms interventions: Eight common pitfalls. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0398-x
Cho, S. W. (2020). Quantifying the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: The case of Sweden. The Econometrics Journal, 23(3), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaa025
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(2), 50–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279
Fabio, A. D., & Rosen, M. A. (2018). Opening the black box of psychological processes in the science of sustainable development: A new frontier. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/3933
Hasan, M. K. H., & Kumar, L. K. (2024). Determining adequate sample size for social survey research: sample size for social survey research. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 22(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v22i2.74547
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., ... & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Hoonakker, P., & Carayon, P. (2009). Questionnaire survey nonresponse: A comparison of postal mail and Internet surveys. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25(5), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310902864951
Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., Cho, G., Choo, H., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). A primer on integrated generalized structured component analysis. European Business Review, 35(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2022-0224
Irimia-Diéguez, A., Velicia-Martín, F., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Predicting FinTech innovation adoption: The mediator role of social norms and attitudes. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00434-6
Irwin, L. N. (2024). Behavioral indicators of heterogeneous subjective experience in animals across the phylogenetic spectrum: Implications for comparative animal phenomenology. Heliyon, 10(7), 1- 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28421
Legros, S., & Cislaghi, B. (2020). Mapping the social-norms literature: An overview of reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866455
Liu, P., Li, M., Dai, D., & Guo, L. (2021). The effects of social commerce environmental characteristics on customers’ purchase intentions: The chain mediating effect of
customer-to-customer interaction and customer-perceived value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 48, 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap. 2021.101073
Napontun, K., & Senachai, P. (2023). Identifying factors influencing consumers not to skip
TrueView advertising on YouTube. ABAC Journal, 43(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacj.2023.6
National Economic and Social Development Council. (2024, February 22). Thailand’s economy in the first quarter of 2024 and outlook for 2024. https://www.nesdc.go.th/main.php?filename=index
Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2–An improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082
Tseng, M. L., Ha, H. M., Tran, T. P. T., Bui, T. D., Chen, C. C., & Lin, C. W. (2022). Building a data-driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2082-2106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3009
Vesci, M., & Botti, A. (2019). Festival quality, theory of planned behavior and revisiting intention: Evidence from local and small Italian culinary festivals. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 38, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm. 2018.10.003
Wang, J., Tao, J., & Chu, M. (2020). Behind the label: Chinese consumers’ trust in food certification and the effect of perceived quality on purchase intention. Food Control, 108, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106825
Xu, J., Pan, Y., & Li, Q. (2024). Influencing factors of health screening among retirees: An extended TPB approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 01-12. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1320920
Xu, L., Zhang, J., Ding, Y., Zheng, J., Sun, G., Zhang, W., & Philbin, S. P. (2023). Understanding the role of peer pressure on engineering students' learning behavior: A TPB perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 01-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1069384
Zhong, Y., & Moon, H. C. (2020). What drives customer satisfaction, loyalty, and happiness in fast-food restaurants in China? Perceived price, service quality, food quality, physical environment quality, and the moderating role of gender. Foods, 9(4), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040460
Yang, N., & Ha-Brookshire, J. E. (2019). Truly sustainable or not? An exploratory assessment of sustainability capability of textile and apparel corporations in China from the moral responsibility perspective. Fashion and Textiles, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0172-6