Path Analysis Model of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Safety for Road Environment Improvement and Accidents Prevention

Authors

  • Nattawut Pumpugsri Graduate School University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce
  • Wanchai Rattanawong Faculty of Engineering, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce (UTCC)
  • Varin Vongmanee Faculty of Engineering, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce (UTCC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53848/jlsco.v11i1.271296

Keywords:

Path analysis, Heavy-duty vehicle safety, Road environment, Accident prevention

Abstract

The 2018 WHO report shows that Thailand has the highest road fatalities and injuries in Asia. This study uses 400 DBQ samples and near-miss data from ADAS and DMS in 246 heavy-duty vehicles to analyze risky driving behaviors from May to July 2022.The research aims to understand the causes of accidents by presenting a safety measurement model in logistics. Each dimension includes the indicators derived from the consensus of the experts, whose backgrounds are in logistics and safety from public and private entities, under the Delphi method. While the methods to evaluate opinions vary upon researchers, without a fixed procedure, the most widely used method is the Delphi method.  With the Kendall's W of 0.402 and p-value less than 1, the study has found that there are four dimensions with 15 factors and 55 indicators explaining the topic. The four dimensions: driver behaviors; unsafe road environments; vehicles; and near-miss events, were tested for their correlations among the variables that relate to road accidents with path analysis, a statistical tool to analyze correlations among variables. The result shows that the improvement in unsafe road conditions and driver behaviors is critical to reduce the road accidents in Thailand. Therefore, the path and correlation analysis enhance the understanding on the correlations of each factor. Moreover, the reliability test has found that the absolute fit indices, including the CMIN/DF of 1.26, RMSEA of 0.026, GFI of 0.97, AGFI of 0.95 and RMR of 0.024, are in satisfactory level as well as the incremental fit indices with the NFI of 0.98, CFI of 0.99, TLI of 0.98 and IFI of 0.99. Therefore, the study on the drivers’ behaviors unsafe road environments, vehicles and near-miss events in this research, together with the proposed model, enable responsible authorities to promote road safety by improving environments and driver behaviors as well as planning the strategy to reduce accidents nationwide.

References

Chantith, C., Permpoonwiwat, C. K., & Hamaide, B. (2021). Measure of productivity loss due to road traffic accidents in Thailand. IATSS Research, 45(1), 131-136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.07.001.

Davoli, L., Martalò, M., Cilfone, A., Belli, L., Ferrari, G., Presta, R., Montanari, R., Mengoni, M., Giraldi, L., Amparore, E. G., Botta, M., Drago, I., Carbonara, G., Castellano, A., & Plomp, J. (2020). On Driver Behavior Recognition for Increased Safety: A Roadmap. Safety, 6(4).

Domenichini, L., Branzi, V., & Smorti, M. (2019). Influence of drivers’ psychological risk profiles on the effectiveness of traffic calming measures. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 123, 243-255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap. 2018.11.025.

Elamrani Abou Elassad, Z., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Karkouch, A. (2020). The application of machine learning techniques for driving behavior analysis: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org /10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103312.

Jomnonkwao, S., Uttra, S., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2020). Forecasting Road Traffic Deaths in Thailand: Applications of Time-Series, Curve Estimation, Multiple Linear Regression, and Path Analysis Models. Sustainability, 12(1).

Mase, J. M., Majid, S., Mesgarpour, M., Torres, M. T., Figueredo, G. P., & Chapman, P. (2020). Evaluating the impact of Heavy Goods Vehicle driver monitoring and coaching to reduce risky behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 146, 105754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105754.

Matemane, R., Moloi, T., & Adelowotan, M. (2022). Appraising Executive Compensation ESG-Based Indicators Using Analytical Hierarchical Process and Delphi Techniques. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 469. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/10/469.

Okafor, C. C., Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. D. (2023). A Delphi approach to evaluating the success factors for the application of smart mobility systems in smart cities: a construction industry perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(8), 1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1968567.

Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space–time suitability of transport indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(8), 597-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1491077.

Pumpugsri, N., Rattanawong, W., & Vongmanee, V. (2023). Development of a Safety Heavy-Duty Vehicle Model Considering Unsafe Acts, Unsafe Conditions and Near-Miss Events Using Structural Equation Model. Sustainability, 15(16), 12150. https://www.mdpi.com /2071-1050/15/16/12150.

Ritmak, N., Rattanawong, W., & Vongmanee, V. (2023). A New Dimension of Health Sustainability Model after Pandemic Crisis Using Structural Equation Model. Sustainability, 15(2).

Shams, Z., Naderi, H., & Nassiri, H. (2021). Assessing the effect of inattention-related error and anger in driving on road accidents among Iranian heavy vehicle drivers. IATSS Research, 45(2), 210-217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.iatssr.2020.09.005.

Taghouti, I., Cristobal, R., Brenko, A., Stara, K., Markos, N., Chapelet, B., Hamrouni, L., Buršić, D., & Bonet, J.-A. (2022). The Market Evolution of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: A Global Supply Chain Analysis and an Application of the Delphi Method in the Mediterranean Area. Forests, 13(5).

Uysal Toraman, A., Topçu, S., Konal Korkmaz, E., & Visiers-Jiménez, L. (2023). Psychometric Evaluation of Turkish Version of the Cultural Competence Assessment Tool: CCA-EUnurse Project. Healthcare, 11(5).

Wang, J., Huang, H., Li, Y., Zhou, H., Liu, J., & Xu, Q. (2020). Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 145, 105680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org /10.1016/j.aap.2020.105680.

Zhu, M., Zhou, W., Hu, M., Du, J., & Yuan, T. (2023). Evaluating the Renewal Degree for Expressway Regeneration Projects Based on a Model Integrating the Fuzzy Delphi Method, the Fuzzy AHP Method, and the TOPSIS Method. Sustainability, 15(4).

Downloads

Published

2025-04-04