TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN THE NEXT NORMAL ERA AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE OF TEACHERS IN SCHOOLS UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE CHANTHABURI TRAT

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the transformational leadership of school administrators in the next normal era, 2) to Study the quality of life of teachers at work, 3) to Study the relationship between transformational leadership of school administrators in the next normal era and the quality of life in the work of teachers, and 4) to study the effects of transformational leadership of school administrators in the next normal era on the quality of life of teachers under Secondary Educational Service Area Office Chanthaburi Trat. The research used a quantitative research method. A sample of 302 people. The Proportional Stratified Random Sampling was used based on the size of schools. The tool was a 5-level estimation questionnaire. The analytical statistics were mean, standard deviation, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis.The research findings found that: 1) transformational leadership of school administrators in the next normal era under Secondary Educational Service Area Office Chanthaburi Trat, which was the sample group, had the overall average at a strongly agree level, 2) quality of working life of teachers under Secondary Educational Service Area Office Chanthaburi Trat, who were the sample group, had the overall average at a strongly agree level, 3) The relationship between transformational leadership of school administrators in the next normal era and quality of work life of teachers under Secondary Educational Service Area Office Chanthaburi Trat had a positive relationship at high level of correlation with statistical significance at the .01, and 4) the forecasting of transformational leadership of school administrators during the next normal era and teachers' quality of work life under the Chanthaburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office, Trat had a significant difference at .01. The predictive equation in unstandardized score was = 1.224 + 0.202 (X₄) + 0.224 (X₁) + 0.118 (X₅) + 0.134 (X₂) and the predictive equation in standardized score was constructed as = 0.269 (X₄) + 0.245 (X₁) + 0.144 (X₅) + 0.149 (X₂)