EDUCATION ANDENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE MEASURES IN ANTI - CORRUPTION ACT, B.E. 2008 CASE STUDY THE TIMEING OF ALLEGTIONS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

Abstract

          The objectives of this research article were to 1) Study the problem of determining the time frame for allegations of government officials under the Administrative Measures Act 2008 on the Prevention and Suppression of Corruption, and the role and authority of public prosecutors in participating in the investigation process of allegations since the beginning. 2) To propose guidelines for amending the criteria for determining the time to receive allegations under the Administrative Measures in the Prevention and Suppression of Corruption B.E. The study was a qualitative research. By studying the relevant documents and inquiring about the corruption experts When the information was obtained, the law with the same offense was analyzed and compared to correct the flawed and ineffective law. According to the research, it was found that 1) According to the Administrative Measures for Prevention and Suppression of Corruption In 2008, the period was not proportional to the actual circumstances. This resulted in a large number of offenders being released from punishment. In addition, the public prosecutor is not authorized to participate in considering allegations in any way. 2) From the problem, the student would like to propose a solution by taking the law which is made in the same offense in foreign countries as the basis for consideration. Most of the foreign laws are long and suitable for serious circumstances. And proposed the prosecutor to have the power to participate in the investigation of the allegations from the beginning. As well as being able to find facts and give advice and advice to the inquiry official so that the process is lawful.