The Status and Context of Community Forest Resources Through Economic Valuation Processes: Production in Sisaket Province

Surasak Chantha
Thailand
Keywords: Community Forest Resources, Economic Valuation
Published: Dec 21, 2025

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) examine the status and contextual conditions of community forest resource products in Sisaket Province, 2) assess the economic value of community forest resource products in Sisaket Province, and 3) identify development guidelines for community products derived from community forest resources in Sisaket Province. A mixed-methods research design integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches was employed. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with 30 key informants and focus group discussions with 15 participants, while quantitative data were obtained through questionnaire surveys administered to a sample of 378 respondents. Data were analyzed using content analysis and descriptive statistical methods.  The research results found that:


1) The findings revealed that 1) the three community forests studied in Sisaket Province are located in border areas that had previously experienced forest encroachment. Community participation in forest conservation and restoration has played a crucial role in establishing clearly defined community forest boundaries and ensuring appropriate resource utilization, particularly non-timber forest products such as mushrooms, wild vegetables, and medicinal plants. These resources are closely linked to local livelihoods, indigenous knowledge, and seasonal ecological cycles, reflecting ecosystem-respectful patterns of use. 2) The economic valuation results indicate that forest product collection serves as a supplementary occupation that enhances household income and food security. In some areas, the annual economic value of community forest products reached as high as 4,781,940 baht, reflecting both resource abundance and sustainable management practices. And 3) The development of community products derived from community forest resources should emphasize sustainable resource use and value addition through local wisdom, product processing, quality upgrading, and market linkage, thereby strengthening community-based economies and long-term self-reliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite

Chantha, S. (2025). The Status and Context of Community Forest Resources Through Economic Valuation Processes: Production in Sisaket Province. Journal of Local Governance and Innovation, 9(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.65205/jlgisrru.2025.290381

Section

Research Articles

Categories

References

กรมส่งเสริมคุณภาพสิ่งแวดล้อม. (2564). ป่าไม้. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 ธันวาคม 2567, จาก http://www.deqp.go.th

นิกร น้อยพรม, และคณะ. (2562). ป่าชุมชนดงสามขา: มูลค่าและคุณค่าทางเศรษฐกิจบ้านน้ำแคม อำเภอท่าลี่ จังหวัดเลย. รายงานวิจัยสาขาเศรษฐศาสตร์ คณะวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏเลย.

ผกามาศ มูลวันดี. (2559). การใช้ประโยชน์ป่าชุมชนโกรกประดู่ ตำบลโคกกลาง อำเภอลำปลายมาศ จังหวัดบุรีรัมย์. วารสารวิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบุรีรัมย์, 8(1), 15–26.

สมหญิง สุนทรวงษ์. (2557). ป่าชุมชนกับสังคมไทย. มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์.

สำนักงานวิชาการป่าไม้. (2541). โครงการประเมินคุณค่าทรัพยากรในพื้นที่ป่าอนุรักษ์: กรณีศึกษาในพื้นที่เขตรักษาพันธุ์สัตว์ป่าห้วยขาแข้ง. มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์.

Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2

Araujo-Santos, I., Kainer, K. A., Grenno, F., & Schiavetti, A. (2025). What affects the sustainability of a non-timber forest product value chain? A case study of an endemic palm harvested by local communities in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 21(56), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-025-00656

Jensen, A. (2009). Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.001

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Hajjar, R., & Oldekop, J. A. (2018). Research frontiers in community forest management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.001

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1976). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED121845.pdf

Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper No. 72). Institute of Development Studies. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/sustainable-rural-livelihoods-a-framework-for-analysis/

Agarwal, S., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of community forests for forest conservation in Nan Province, Thailand. Journal of Land Use Science, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2022.2033567

Suksanee, K., Mintrasak, N., Makae, A., & Kitiwinit, S. (2025). Participatory processes in identity building for the development of a stingless beekeeping community enterprise group at the farmer school. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 12(9), 318–326.

United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Inclusive market development. UNDP.