Peer Review Process

Manuscript Submission

 

Initial Editorial Review (within 7-14 working days)

  • The editor checks for relevance to the journal's scope, adherence to formatting guidelines, and proper referencing style.
  • If revisions are required, authors are notified within 7-14 working days.

 

Double-Blind Peer Review (within 1 month)

  • Manuscripts meeting initial criteria are assigned to at least three independent experts for double-blind peer review.
  • Reviewers assess the manuscript's originality, significance, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field.

 

Editorial Decision and Author Notification (within 7 working days)

  • The editor considers reviewer feedback and decides on acceptance, rejection, or revision (major or minor).
  • Authors are notified of the decision via email.

 

Revision and Resubmission (if required)

  • Authors have 7-14 working days to revise their manuscript according to reviewer comments.
  • Revised manuscripts are resubmitted to the editorial team.

 

Copy-Editing and Proofreading

  • Accepted manuscripts undergo copy-editing to ensure clarity, consistency, and adherence to journal style.
  • Authors may be asked to address any final issues.

 

Publication

  • Final manuscripts are published online in the Journal of Language and Culture (JLC), accessible through ThaiJO.

 

Additional Information

  • Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field. Potential conflicts of interest are carefully considered.
  • Confidentiality: All reviewer comments and author identities are kept confidential throughout the process.
  • Ethical Considerations: The journal adheres to ethical guidelines for peer review, including those outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
  • Timelines: The journal strives to complete the peer review process within a reasonable timeframe, typically within two months of initial submission.
  • Author Appeals: Authors may appeal editorial decisions if they have concerns about the review process or decision.

 

Commitment to Quality and Transparency

JLC is committed to maintaining a rigorous and transparent peer review process that aligns with standards. We believe that this process ensures the quality, integrity, and credibility of the research we publish.