การสำรวจภูมิทัศน์ของการจัดการเรียนรู้แบบไม่เป็นทางการ: กลยุทธ์ เทคโนโลยีและผลกระทบ

Suntana  Sutadarat; Busara Niyomves

doi:10.60027/iarj.2024.276782

Authors

Suntana Sutadarat Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1534-0533
Busara Niyomves Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-9310

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/iarj.2024.276782

Keywords:

Landscape; , Informal Learning Management; , Strategies;, Technologies; , Impacts

Abstract

Background and Aims: Navigating the landscape of informal learning is paramount if organizations want to maintain their competitive advantage and be successful according to the stated objectives. Since informal learning is dynamic, emphasizing the continuous learning that can be used, information about informal learning management is therefore necessary, giving the organizations information on informal learning. This will help not only organizations to create a culture of continuous improvement but also personnel to create innovations.

Methodology: Research on this subject was carried out through systematic collection and analysis of well-known literature to compile resources and significant keywords related to the strategies, technologies, and impacts of informal learning management comprehensively and in detail. This study will help to build an understanding of informal learning management from diverse perspectives and reliable sources.

Results: The key concepts in navigating the landscape of informal learning management encompass several dimensions. First, the components of informal learning management must be considered: social learning, work experience, and exchange of knowledge between people. Recognizing these elements allows organizations to strategically leverage and appropriately support informal learning initiatives. Second, the technology that facilitates informal learning plays an important role, including applications, social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn), and learning experience platforms. Effective use of these technologies can meet the diverse needs of students, especially in the modern landscape where the world is driven by technology. Third, organizing informal learning has an impact on organizational development, leading to more efficient personnel, initiation of an innovation culture, and adoption of technological changes and advances. Organizations, therefore, should establish informal learning in the organizational structure.

Conclusion: This study of the landscape of informal learning management highlights the importance of understanding diverse learning styles, strategic use of technology, and the need to integrate informal learning into an organizational structure to stay in line with technological advancements and increase the potential of personnel through their learning paths.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Allen & Unwin.

Bingham, T., & Conner, M.L. (2015). The new social learning: Connect. Collaborate. Work (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Bonk, C.J. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

Chatti, M.A., Dyckhoff, A.L., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Learning and knowledge building with wikis: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 32–47.

Childress, M.D., & Spurgin, K.A. (2009). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 6(4), 12–22.

Clark, R.C., & Mayer, R.E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z.L. Berge & L.Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Routledge.

Cross, J. (2007). Informal learning: Rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. Pfeiffer.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

Ellinger, A.D., & Bostrom, R.P. (2002). Managers' perceived benefits of and barriers to learning: An exploratory investigation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2), 151–169.

Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.

Ford, J.D. (2009). Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 26–50.

Google. (n.d.). The Google 20% project. Retrieved December 15, 2023, from https://20percentproject.withgoogle.com/

Graham, C.R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–50.

Horton, W. (2014). E-learning by design. John Wiley & Sons.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus Books.

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528.

Marsick, V.J., & Volpe, M. (1999). The nature and need for informal learning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1(3), 1-9.

Marsick, V.J., & Watkins, K.E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge.

Nielsen, M. (2017). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked science. Princeton University Press.

Phillips, J.J., & Phillips, P.P. (2017). Measuring the success of learning through technology: A guide for measuring impact and calculating ROI on e-learning, blended learning, and mobile learning. American Society for Training and Development.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). Wiley.

Ragins, B.R., & Kram, K.E. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications.

Richter, S., & Adkins, B. (2020). The learning experience platform (LXP) market 2020. Fosway Group.

Rosenberg, M.J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill.

Sharples, M., Adams, A., Alozie, N., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Gaved, M., & Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovating pedagogy 2019: Open University innovation report 7. The Open University.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

M. (n.d.). 15% culture. Retrieved December 15, 2023, from https://www.3m.com/

Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1–12.

Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars’ participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336–349.

Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C.C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 144-166.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review Press.