A Study of Needs for Developing Triamudomsuksapattanakarn Ratchada School Teacher’s Team Building

Main Article Content

Chanettee Muangmoon
Dhirapat Kulophas

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the current conditions, desired conditions, and priority needs in team building development among teachers at Triamdomsuksapattanakarn Ratchada School. The population included 136 participants, comprising school administrators, government teachers, and educational personnel. The research instrument was a questionnaire validated for content accuracy by experts. Data were analyzed using mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and the modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified).The findings revealed that the current state of team building among teachers at Triamudomsuksapattanakarn Ratchada School was at a high level. Among the components, interpersonal relationships received the highest mean score, whereas problem-solving skills scored the lowest. The desirable state of overall collective responsibility was at the highest level. In this state, the interpersonal relationships was the highest mean and leadership and guidance ranked lowest. Based on the Modified Priority Needs Index, the highest priority was problem-solving skills, followed by leadership and guidance, communication skills, team cohesion, and interpersonal relationships respectively. These findings serve as empirical data to inform targeted and sustainable strategies for enhancing teacher team-building aligned with their essential developmental needs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Muangmoon, C., & Kulophas, D. (2026). A Study of Needs for Developing Triamudomsuksapattanakarn Ratchada School Teacher’s Team Building. Journal of Social Sciences in Measurement Evaluation Statistics and Research, 7(1), 1–16. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mesr/article/view/290142
Section
Research Article

References

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. (2562). แนวทางพัฒนาหลักสูตรฐานสมรรถนะ. กรุงเทพฯ: สพฐ.

โรงเรียนเตรียมอุดมศึกษาพัฒนาการ รัชดา. (2566). รายงานผลการดำเนินการโรงเรียนเตรียมอุดมศึกษาพัฒนาการ รัชดา.

Beauchamp, M. R., McEwan, D., & Waldhauser, K. J. (2017). Team building: Conceptual, methodological, and applied considerations. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 114-117.

Cheruvelil, K. S., Soranno, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Hanson, P. C., Goring, S. J., Filstrup, C. T., & Read, E. K. (2014). Creating and maintaining high‐performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1), 31-38.

Dyer Jr, W. G., Dyer, J. H., & Dyer, W. G. (2013). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Friedley, S. A., & Manchester, B. B. (2005). Building team cohesion: Becoming" We" instead of" Me. National Forensic Journal, 23(1), 95-100.

Gordon, A. B. (2003). Expert Coaches' Perceptions of Team Building.

Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2015). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in education, 22(1), 31-34.

Kuriacha, N. (2023). TEAM BUILDING AT THE ENTERPRISE: ESSENCE AND PURPOSE. Black Sea Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.32782/bses.79-16

Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational administration quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.

Liebowitz, S. J., & De Meuse, K. P. (1982). The application of team building. Human Relations, 35(1), 1-18.

Mealiea, L., & Baltazar, R. (2005). A strategic guide for building effective teams. Public Personnel Management, 34(2), 141-160.

Munir, H., & Fatima, Q. (2023). Team building at the enterprise: Essence and purpose. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(01), 431-440.

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small group research, 36(5), 555-599.

Schwarz, R. M. (2013). Smart leaders, smarter teams: How you and your team get unstuck to get results. John Wiley & Sons.

Tassi, J. M., López-Gajardo, M. A., Leo, F. M., Díaz-García, J., & García-Calvo, T. (2023). An intervention program based on team building during tactical training tasks to improve team functioning. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1065323.

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, X.-M., & Hwang, G.-J. (2017). A problem posing-based practicing strategy for facilitating students’ computer programming skills in the team-based learning mode. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 1655-1671.