From Likert-type Scale to Likert-like Scale

Main Article Content

Ronnagrit Phonman
Maleerat Kajitnatitham

Abstract

The Likert-summated rating scale is a research tool widely used by social and behavioral science researchers in Thailand. However, this instrument still exhibits several weaknesses and raises interesting notions that academics have introduced to guide the development of Likert-based estimation scales towards greater efficiency. Therefore, this article will present the main points regarding the Likert-type Scale and the issues that should be considered to improve and develop the scale into a Likert-like Scale, covering 5 key issues: 1) Whether the Likert-summated rating scale is an ordinal or interval scale, 2) Whether a 5-point rating scale is sufficient for measurement, 3) Whether the rating scale should have equal intervals and balanced response choices, 4) Whether the rating scale's response choices should be even or odd, and 5) How to define the level or intensity of feelings in the rating scale. The discussion of each issue in this article is not prescriptive for readers. Instead, it may serve as a guideline for designing rating scales that are appropriate for the context and beneficial for developing research quality to ensure internal validity, as well as for enhancing the efficiency of rating scales.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phonman, R. ., & Kajitnatitham, M. . (2024). From Likert-type Scale to Likert-like Scale. Journal of Social Sciences in Measurement Evaluation Statistics and Research, 5(1), 1–15. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mesr/article/view/275553
Section
Academic Articles

References

ไพฑูรย์ โพธิสาร. (2547). มาตรวัดลิเคอร์ท. สารานุกรมศึกษาศาสตร์ คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ, 31, 17-20.

รังสรรค์ โฉมยา. (2549). สเกลคู่ มิติใหม่ในการใช้แบบวัดมาตราส่วนประมาณค่าแบบลิเคิร์ท. เทคโนโลยีสื่อสารการศึกษา, 13(1), 145-151.

สุนันท์ สีพาย, สุภีร์ สีพาย, และจารุวรรณ สกุลคู. (2565). แบบวัดคุณลักษณะทางจิตวิทยา. วารสารวัดผลการศึกษามหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม, 28(2), 41-61.

สุบิน ยุระรัช. (2565). ทำไมต้องลิเคิร์ต. วารสารนวัตกรรมและการจัดการ, 7(1), 152-165.

Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten Common Misunderstanding, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and Their Antidotes. Journal of Social Science, 3(3), 106-116.

Friedman, H. H., Wilamowsky, Y., & Friedman, L. W. (1981). A Comparison of Balanced and Unbalanced Rating Scales. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 19, 1-7.

Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to ab(use) them. Medical Education, 38, 1212-1218.

Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for The Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 5-55.

Meric, H. & Wagner, J. (2006). Rating Scale Format Choices for Multi-Item Measures: Does Numbering and Balanced-ness Matter?. https://www.westga.edu/~bquest/ 2006/rating.pdf

Nadler, J. T., Weston, R., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Stuck in the Middle: The Use and Interpretation of Mid-Points in Items on Questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology, 142(42), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.994590

Simm, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L. (2019). Does the Number of Response Options Matter? Psychometric Perspectives Using Personality Questionnaire Data. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648

Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert Type Data in Social Science Research: Confusion, Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Science, 3(2), 36-49. https://ijcar.net/assets/pdf/Vol3-No2-February2016/02.pdf

Tatum, D. S. (1998). Research problems--Rasch solutions. Popular Measurement, 1(1), 6-8. https://www.rasch.org/pm/pm1-06.pdf

Todd, W, R. (2018). Analyzing and Interpreting Rating Scale Data from Questionnaires. REFLections, 14, 69-77.https://so05.tcithaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/114230/88621

Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors.https://media.clemson.edu/cbshs/prtm/research/resources-for-research-page-2/Vagias-Likert-Type-Scale-Response-Anchors.pdf