Systematic Review in Educational Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
The systematic review serves as a research framework for gathering educational knowledge on various topics, aiding in addressing crucial research questions, particularly in the context of learning design, educational technology, and various learning formats. The systematic review process involves rigorous, structured, and transparent steps to ensure research quality and achieve the desired research objectives. Key steps in this process include: 1) Defining research questions and objectives: Clearly identifying the focus and goals of the review. 2) Research inquiry: Searching for and collecting research relevant to the topic of interest to serve as a valuable information source for the literature review. 3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Deciding which research works should be included in the literature review process and which should be excluded to maintain quality and alignment with the review objectives. 4) Quality assessment of research: Evaluating and assessing the quality of the collected research works using predefined criteria. And 5) Data extraction, synthesis, and reporting of research findings: Extracting data from selected research works for systematic literature review purposes and summarizing and reporting the findings to inform the development of appropriate learning models and education policies. This systematic review process enables educational researchers to systematically gather structured and high-quality educational knowledge, which can be used to enhance learning models and policies tailored to current and future educational contexts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ข้อความและบทความในวารสารการวัด ประเมินผล สถิติ และการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์ เป็นแนวคิดของผู้เขียน มิใช่ความคิดเห็นของกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร จึงมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของวารสารการวัด ประเมินผล สถิติ และการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์ บทความในวารสารต้องไม่เคยตีพิมพ์ที่ใดมาก่อน และสงวนสิทธิ์ตามกฎหมายไทย การจะนำไปเผยแพร่ ต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากกองบรรณาธิการ
References
Chiangkhong, A., Suwanwong, C., & Wongrostrai, Y. (2023). Lifestyle, clinical, and occupational risk factors of recurrent stroke among the working-age group: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon, 9(3), e13949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13949
Howard, B., Diug, B., & Ilic, D. (2022). Methods of teaching evidence-based practice: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 742. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03812-x
Jahan, N., Naveed, S., Zeshan, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2016). How to conduct a systematic review: A narrative literature review. Cureus, 8(11), e864. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.864
Knogler, M., Hetmanek, A., & Seidel, T. (2022). Determining an evidence base for particular fields of educational practice: A systematic review of meta-analyses on effective mathematics and science teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873995
Kolaski, K., Logan, L. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2023). Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 12, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9
López-Nicolás, R., López-López, J. A., Rubio-Aparicio, M., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2022). A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020). Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z
Munn, Z., Stern, C., Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., & Jordan, Z. (2018). What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and applications. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research (pp. 3-22). Springer.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffman, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 371, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic review in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Polanin, J. R., Hennessy, E. A., & Tsuji, S. (2020). Transparency and reproducibility of meta-analyses in psychology: A meta-review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1026-1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906416
Polanin, J. R., Maynard, B. R., & Dell, N. A. (2017). Overviews in education research: A systematic review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172-203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631117
Shi, Y., Pyne, K., Kulophas, D., & Bangpan, M. (2022). Exploring equity in educational policies and interventions in primary and secondary education in the context of public health emergencies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/ijer.2021.101911
Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022). Using research to inform practice through research-practice partnerships: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 10(1), e3337. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3337
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research. Springer.