Systematic Review in Educational Research

Main Article Content

Charin Suwanwong

Abstract

The systematic review serves as a research framework for gathering educational knowledge on various topics, aiding in addressing crucial research questions, particularly in the context of learning design, educational technology, and various learning formats. The systematic review process involves rigorous, structured, and transparent steps to ensure research quality and achieve the desired research objectives. Key steps in this process include: 1) Defining research questions and objectives: Clearly identifying the focus and goals of the review. 2) Research inquiry: Searching for and collecting research relevant to the topic of interest to serve as a valuable information source for the literature review. 3) Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Deciding which research works should be included in the literature review process and which should be excluded to maintain quality and alignment with the review objectives. 4) Quality assessment of research: Evaluating and assessing the quality of the collected research works using predefined criteria. And 5) Data extraction, synthesis, and reporting of research findings: Extracting data from selected research works for systematic literature review purposes and summarizing and reporting the findings to inform the development of appropriate learning models and education policies. This systematic review process enables educational researchers to systematically gather structured and high-quality educational knowledge, which can be used to enhance learning models and policies tailored to current and future educational contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suwanwong, C. (2024). Systematic Review in Educational Research. Journal of Social Sciences in Measurement Evaluation Statistics and Research, 5(2), 1–20. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mesr/article/view/273264
Section
Academic Articles

References

Chiangkhong, A., Suwanwong, C., & Wongrostrai, Y. (2023). Lifestyle, clinical, and occupational risk factors of recurrent stroke among the working-age group: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon, 9(3), e13949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13949

Howard, B., Diug, B., & Ilic, D. (2022). Methods of teaching evidence-based practice: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 742. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03812-x

Jahan, N., Naveed, S., Zeshan, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2016). How to conduct a systematic review: A narrative literature review. Cureus, 8(11), e864. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.864

Knogler, M., Hetmanek, A., & Seidel, T. (2022). Determining an evidence base for particular fields of educational practice: A systematic review of meta-analyses on effective mathematics and science teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873995

Kolaski, K., Logan, L. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2023). Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 12, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9

López-Nicolás, R., López-López, J. A., Rubio-Aparicio, M., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2022). A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020). Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01644-z

Munn, Z., Stern, C., Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., & Jordan, Z. (2018). What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4

Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and applications. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research (pp. 3-22). Springer.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffman, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 371, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic review in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Polanin, J. R., Hennessy, E. A., & Tsuji, S. (2020). Transparency and reproducibility of meta-analyses in psychology: A meta-review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1026-1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906416

Polanin, J. R., Maynard, B. R., & Dell, N. A. (2017). Overviews in education research: A systematic review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172-203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631117

Shi, Y., Pyne, K., Kulophas, D., & Bangpan, M. (2022). Exploring equity in educational policies and interventions in primary and secondary education in the context of public health emergencies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j/ijer.2021.101911

Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022). Using research to inform practice through research-practice partnerships: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 10(1), e3337. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3337

Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research. Springer.