Main Article Content
This quasi experiment research with two-group pretest-posttest design aimed to compare the effects from the use of a procedural model to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease by implementing and holding on 3R (Risk stratification—Risk education—Risk reduction) with Royal Thai Air Force personnel. A sample of 60 with risk of coronary heart disease were divided into experimental and control groups of 30 each. Data concerning the risk were collected before and 3 months after using procedural model, and the follow-up data were collected 1 year later in order to examine the persistence of the model’s results. Descriptive statistics and t- test were used for data analysis.
The results showed that 1) the risk to coronary heart disease of the experimental group in 3 months and one year after using procedural model was less than before using the procedural model with statistical significance of p<0.05; 2) the risk to coronary heart disease of the experimental group was less than that of the control group with statistical significance of p<0.05 both in 3 months after using the model and one year later. It might be concluded that persons using a procedural model are less exposed to the risk of coronary heart disease.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyrights of the article are retained by the author(s) but the Journal of Liberal Arts reserves the right for the article’s first publication, and as the article will appear in an accessible journal, the article can, therefore, be used for educational purposes but not commercially.