Main Article Content
The objective of this study was to study the role of Yala Biodiesel Community Enterprise in improving the quality of life of disabled people. The qualitative approach is used to collect data by in-depth interviews with Yala Bio-diesel Enterprise Chairman, employees, persons with disabilities serving on the enterprise committee, members and their family members. The total number of participants was 13. Data were also collected from relevant documents, papers or research and non-participant observation. The data were analyzed by classification, interpretation, and conclusions.The study found that group processes and activities play a role in promoting the quality of life of the disabled at the member, family and community levels. At the member level, they improve people’s education, income, health, ethics and communication. At the family level, they create more income, families with warmth and hygienic residences. At the community level, they improve the environment and create more participation of people in the community as well as more social space for the disabled.
The study offers the following recommendations. People with disabilities should be encouraged to have a career which will bring more income. There should be ways to manage income as group welfare, as well as to cooperate with other agencies and organizations for further sustainability.
The copyrights of the article are retained by the author(s) but the Journal of Liberal Arts reserves the right for the article’s first publication, and as the article will appear in an accessible journal, the article can, therefore, be used for educational purposes but not commercially.
Bunsatorn, A. (2006). Quality of life measurement tools in line with systematic theoretical studies. National Demographic Conference, Thai Population Association. [in Thai]
Chantawanich, S. (2011). Data analysis in qualitative research. Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Department of Promotion and Development of the Quality of Life of the Disabled. (2016, September 20). Report on the situation of people with disabilities in Thailand. Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. http://dep.go.th/sites/default/files/files/news/
Report_PWDS_SEP2559.pdf. [in Thai]
Jamarik, S. (2008). Human rights: Article summaries Prof. Saneh Jamarik. Office of the National Human Rights Commission. [in Thai]
Ketthat, S. (1997). The dream of the nation: In the study group of academic role of the school to the community. Eastern Printing. [in Thai]
Kritsanaphuti, W. (2011). Social welfare. Khon Kaen: Klungnana Printing Press.
Lawang, W., Tassanatanachai, A., & Sunsern, R. (2014). Support strategies for enhancing quality of life of persons with disability in Thailand. Journal of Nursing and Education, 7(2), 2-16. [in Thai]
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. (2005). Study report project for determining quality of life indicators. Bureau of Social Development and Human Security Standards. [in Thai]
National Statistical Office. (2013). Disability survey 2013. Thana Press. [in Thai]
Owathapesat, M. (2009, August 8). Good quality of life: Komchadluek, 30. [in Thai]
Phothong, C., Deenan, A., & Sunsern, R. (2014). Effectiveness of integrated rehabilitation model for persons with physical disability in community. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 15(2), 232-241. [in Thai]
Plano Clark, V.L. & Creswell, J.W. (Eds.). (2008). The Mixed Methods Reader. Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications.
Promjan, S., Wiriyapongsukit, S., Boonsoh, R., & Khongsin, N. (2017). Predictive power of self-esteem on quality of life among disabled people. The Southern College Network Journal of Nursing and Public Health, 4(1), 47-59. [in Thai]
Reid, A.J. (1996). “What we want: Qualitative research”. Canadian Family Physician 42, 387-389.
Sale, J.E., Lohfeld, L.H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality @ Quantity, 36, 43-53.
Siwapattarapong, S. (2004). Process to promoting quality of life for individuals with disabilities in healthy community [Unpublished master’s degree independent study]. Chaing Mai University. [in Thai]
Sriutaisuk S. (2014). Meaning in life and quality of life among pre-retirement age Chulalongkorn University staff, Thailand. Journal of Health Research: Emerald, 28(Suppl.), 107-112.
Sunsern, R., Timsuwan, B., Lawang, L., Rodjakpai, Y., Punnotok, R., & Chantanimit, C. (2010). Integrating community based rehabilitation into overall primary health care: lessons learned from Thailand. Journal of Nursing and Education, 3(2), 99-113. [in Thai]
Tinnabutra, V. (2016). Guidelines for developing the quality of life of wheelchair disable persons in Bangkok Metropolitan and surrounding provinces. Payap University Journal, 26(1), 207-232. [in Thai]
Vilawan, B., & Nantiyakul, P. (2017). Administration of quality of life development of people with disabilities of the prachinburi provincial administrative organization according to the sufficiency economy philosophy. EAU Heritage Journal Social Science and Humanities, 7(3), 139-149. [in Thai]
Wasi, P. (1999). Educational reform intellectual overhaul: The way to escape from the disaster. Sodsrisaritwong Foundation. [in Thai]
Wongpanarak, N., & Wongpiriyayothar, A. (2015). Relationships between self-esteem, social support, and quality of life among persons with disabilities in urban areas. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 16(3), 14-22. [in Thai]