Factors Influencing the Expression of Red-Whiskered Bulbul Club Members in Srinakarin Bangkok Area

Main Article Content

Pitsarn Phanwattana

Abstract

          The purpose of this research was to investigate the influence of personal characteristic, level of knowledge, motivation, and involvement in activities on the expression of bird club members. This quantitative study used a questionnaire to collect data from 180 members of Red-whiskered Bulbul Club in the Srinakarin Bangkok area. The data were analyzed, using descriptive statistics and path analysis. The results indicated that motivation had the most direct influence on the expression of the club members (.676) and personal characteristic had the most indirect and the highest total influence on their expression (.602/1.043).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (research article)

References

Agarwal, J., Osiyevskyy, O., & Feldman, P. (2015). Corporate reputation measurement: Alternative factor structures, nomological validity, organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 485-506.
Amiot, C., Lorvelec, O., Dalger, I.M., Sardella, A., Lequilliec, P., & Clergeau, P. (2007). Rapid morphological divergence of introduced Red-whiskered Bulbuls Pycnonotusjocosus in contrasting environments. International Journal of Avian Science, 149(3), 482-489.
Berchtold, A. (2016). Test–retest: Agreement or reliability?. Methodological Innovations, 9(1), 1-17.
Birds Association in Thailand. (2014). Red-Whiskered Bulbul. Journal of the Breeding Birds of Thailand, 6, 27-33. [in Thai]
Caspar, R., Peytcheva, E., Yan, T., Lee, S., Liu, M., & Hu, M. (2016). Cross-cultural survey guidelines: Pretesting. http://www.ccsg.isr.umich.edu/ images%5cpdfs%5CCCSG_Pretesting.pdf
Engellant, K.A., Holland, D.D., & Piper, R.T. (2016). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity of the motivation construct for the technology integration education (TIE) model. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(1), 37-50.
Hecimovich, M.D., & Hebert, J.J. (2016). Reliability and concurrent validity of an alternative method of lateral range of motion in athletes. SAJSM, 28(1), 23-26.
Gastil, R.D. (2011). The determinants of human behavior. American Anthropologist New Series, 63(6), 1281-1291.
Government Gazette. (2003). The ministerial regulation prescribes the type of wildlife to be protected as a species of animal species in the year 2003. Government Gazette, 120, 11-17. [in Thai]
Government Gazette. (2014). Wildlife conservation and protection act (No.3), 2014. Government Gazette, 131, 4. [in Thai]
Horst, R.T., Jaeger, M., Smeekens, S.P., Oosting, M., & Swertz, M.A. (2016). Host and environmental factors influencing individual human cytokine responses. Cell, 167, 1111–1124.
Lafave, L., Tyminski, S., Riege, T., Hoy, D., & Dexter, B. (2015). Content validity for a child care self-assessment tool: Creating healthy eating environments scale (CHEERS). Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 77(2), 89-92.
Office of the Royal Institute. (2018). Means of club. http://www.royin. go.th/?knowledges=ชมรม-๓๑-มกราคม –๒๕๕๓. [in Thai]
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health, 42(5), 533–544.
Phanwattana, P. (2014). Red-Whiskered Bulbul and utilization for community police relations in the South. Journal of Hat Yai, 12, 105-111.
Phanwattana, P. (2014). Factors affecting of work effectiveness of inquiry female police official in metropolitan. Sripatum University. [in Thai]
Prasith-rathsint, S. (2015). Universal standard procedures for concept measurement. Samlada. [in Thai]
Prasith-rathsint, S. (2012). Social science research methodology. Samlada. [in Thai]
Rojas, S.L., & Widiger, T.A. (2013). Convergent and discriminant validity of the five factor form. Assessment, 21(2), 143-157.
Roth, P.L., Huy, L., Sue, O.I., Van Iddekinge, C.H., Buster, M.A., Robbins, S.B., & Campion, M.A. (2014). Differential validity for cognitive ability tests in employment and educational settings: Not much more than range restriction?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 47-46.
Rogers, K.D., Pilling, M., Davies, L., Belk, R., Green, C.N., & Young, A. (2016). Translation, validity and reliability of the British Sign Language version of the EQ-5D-5L. Qual Life Res, 25, 1825-1834.
Ryu, E. (2013). Factorial invariance in multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67(1), 172-194.
Sato, T. & Ikeda, N. (2015). Test-taker perception of what test items measure: a potential impact of face validity on student learning. Language Testing in Asia, 5(10), 1-16.
Songsunthontam, C., & Jedaluk, V. (2016). The influences of motivation at work and the perceived organizational support toward the operation excellence of employees in the office of educational technology, Sukhothai Thammathirat open university. Journal of Education SukhothaiThammathirat, 6(1), 133-150. [in Thai]
Terasvirta, T., & Yang, Y. (2015). Linearity and misspecification tests for vector smooth transition regression models. http://ftp.econ.au.dk/creates/rp/14/
rp14_04.pdf
Wildlife Research Group Wildlife Conservation Office. (2011). Study on ecology and economic potential of Red-Whiskered Bulbul Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation.
Yong, A.G. & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.