Main Article Content
This analytical study aimed to identify the move organization and linguistic features of research article abstracts in the technical education discipline. Sixty abstracts, 30 from Journal of Industrial of Education, King Mongkut‘s Institute of Technology Lardkrabang and 30 from Journal of Technical of Education, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, published between 2014-2019 were randomly selected for analysis. Hyland’s move pattern (2000) was applied as an analytic framework of the study. The results indicated that the abstracts from the technical education field were mainly concentrated on the purpose, method, and product, which differs from the norm of abstracts proposed by Hyland’s move pattern: introduction, purpose, method, product, and conclusion. Additionally, the results revealed that all of the main five moves occurred in sixty collected abstracts. Among the five moves, Purpose move was found as the most obligatory move, accounting for 100%. The following frequently found moves were Method move and Product move (98%). Conclusion move was found at 40% of the corpus. The last move which had the least frequency was Introduction move (15%). Regarding linguistic features, present tense and active voice were used in every move. The findings of the study provide insights and pedagogical implications for improving abstract writing in technical education. Recommendations are also offered for further studies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright to their article but the Journal of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University reserves the exclusive rights to first publication.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman Group UK Limited.
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Iberica, 4, 3-19.
Briones, R.R.Y. (2018). Move analysis of abstracts in Applied Linguistics research: The Middle East and North America (MENA) Perspectives. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 6, 25-55.
Chen, T.Y., & Kuo, C.H. (2012). A genre-based analysis of the information structure of master’s theses in applied linguistics. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(1), 24-52.
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 4, 428 - 446.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663-688.
Darabad, A.M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2) , 125-140.
Doro, K. (2013). The rhetorical structure of research article abstracts in English Studies Journal. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119-137.
Ebadi, S., Salman., Nguyen, T.T.L., & Weisi, H. (2019). Rhetorical structure variation in abstracts and introductions in Applied Linguistics master’s theses by Iraqi and international students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching, 7(1), 101-117.
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1) , 121-150.
Hanidar, S. (2016). Rhetorical patterns, verb tenses, and voice in cross disciplinary research article abstracts. Humaniora, 28(1), 12-27.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing (4th ed.). USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterization of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies.,19(3), 1-10.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2009). Generic structure of research article abstracts in sciences. Journal of English Studies, 4, 95-111.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292.
Kearttikul, P., & Wimolkasem, N. (2013). Analyses of move structure, tense, voice of published research article abstracts between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Proceedings of 95th ISERD International Conference, Yokohama-Japan, 9th -10th December 2017, 1-6.
Li, Y. (2011). A genre analysis of English and Chinese research article abstracts in Linguistics and Chemistry. Unpublished master’s thesis, San Diego State University, United States of America.
Li, Q., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Research article abstracts in two published of business-move structure and hedging between management and marketing. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 52-62.
Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization, English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.
Martin, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (1), 25-43.
McHugh, M.L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The Kappa statistic. Biochem, 22, 276-282.
Nurhayati, S.S. (2017). Verb tense analysis of research article abstracts in Asian EFL Journal. Progressive, 12(2): 57-62.
Pasavoravate, Y. (2011). Genre analysis of thesis and dissertation abstracts in linguistics written by students in Thailand and students in England. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250.
Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162 -166.
Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in environmental science and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 81-93.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 93-113.
Samraj, B. (2002). Disciplinary variation in abstracts: The case of wildlife behavior and conservation biology. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 40-56). London: Pearson.
Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481-499.
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27-39.
Wannarak, A., & Amnuai, W. (2016). A comparison of rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research articles published in international and national Thai journals. RELC Journal, 47, 193-211.
Zand-Moghadam, A., & Meihami (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 5(1), 1- 23.
Zhang, B., & Wannarak, A. (2016). Rhetorical structure of Education research article methods sections. PASAA, 51, 155-179.
Zhao, J., & Wu, T. (2013). A genre analysis of medical abstracts by Chinese and English native speakers. Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA. 28(1), 60-64.