Determinants of Calendar Spread of SET50 Index Futures

Main Article Content

Chatchawan Nootkasem
Sirikiat Ratchusanti
Chanon Chingchayanurak


Speculation on the spreads of futures contracts with different expiry dates or calendar spreads may have good return, and it is less risky than outright positions. If determinants of the spreads are known, it may increase the chance of profitability. With the help of Vector Autoregression (VAR), this study tested the variables recommended by Hemler and Longstaff model and an empirical study including T-bill interest rate, market turnover, volatility of the underlying asset and time to maturity of contracts. It was found that all of the above variables, except the interest rate, were Granger-causes and leading indicators of the SET50 calendar spreads but depending on market conditions. By the way, explanatory powers of the variables were low. This perhaps resulted from missing of important factors, for example, behaviors of the market players.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nootkasem, C. ., Ratchusanti, S. ., & Chingchayanurak, C. . (2020). Determinants of Calendar Spread of SET50 Index Futures. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University, 15(2), 1–18. Retrieved from
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Chatchawan Nootkasem, มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่

M.Sc. (Finance), Chiang Mai University, (2019).

Sirikiat Ratchusanti

M.Ba. (Finance & Banking), Chulalongkorn University (1980), Associate Professor, Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University, Currently in Retirement.

Chanon Chingchayanurak

M.Sc. (International Business), Aston University (2014), Currently a Lecturer in Finance Department, Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University


Chang, C. & Lin, E. (2014). On the Determinants of Basis Spread for Taiwan Index Futures and the Role of

Speculators. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies. 17(1). 1-30.

Cornell, B. & French, K. R. (1983). The Pricing of Stock Index Futures. The Journal of Futures Markets.

(1). 1–14.

Hemler, M. L. & Longstaff. F. (1991). General Equilibrium Stock Index Futures Prices: Theory and Empirical

Evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 26(3). 287–308.

Hsu, H. & Wang, J. (2004). Price expectation and the pricing of stock index futures. Review of Quantitative

Finance and Accounting. 23(2). 167–184.

Kawaller, I. G., Koch, P. D. & Liu, L. (2002). Calendar Spreads, Outright Futures Positions, and Risk.

The Journal of Alternative Investments. 5(3). 59-74.

Lu, Y. (2011). The Pricing of Stock Index Future : A Case in Hong Kong’s Market. Master Thesis,

Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Marcinkiewicz, E. (2013). An Empirical Study of the Determinants of Index Futures Basis: The Case

of Warsaw Stock Exchange. Doctorate Thesis, Lodz University of Technology, Poland.

Manu, K. S. (2015). A Comparison of Hemler & Longstaff Model and Cost of Carry Model: The Case of

Stock Index Futures. International Journal of Management. 6(1). 724-732.

Pornananchaikul, Vasuda. (2011). Spread Trading on SET50 Index Futures : Evidence in Thailand.

Master Thesis, Thammasat University, Thailand. (in Thai).

Roll, R., Schwartz, E. & Subrahmanyam, A. (2007). Liquidity and the Law of One Price: The Case of

the Futures-Cash Basis. Journal of Finance. 62(5). 2201-2234.