STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT OF LEISURE SPORTS TO PROMOTE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR PUTIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

Objective: Preliminary discussion on the study of leisure sports development strategies that improve the quality of life of college students in Putian. Methods: Random sampling methods are used in four grades. Fill in the "Questionnaire of the Quality of College Students in Putian City" and "Questionnaire on Putian University Student Leisure Sports Development Methods". A total of 379 valid questionnaires were recovered according to the Krejci & Morgan scale. Use SPSS software for statistical analysis and processing.

Results: In terms of quality of life: The quality of life of gender and grade has a high degree of significant differences (P <0.01). The professional quality of life has significant differences (P <0.05), and the three items of ethnic groups, sources and only children of students No significant differences (P> 0.05). In the survey of the relationship between the quality of life and the development of leisure and sports, Putian University students exercise motivation, sports participation, sports consumption, social support and information channels are positively related to life (P <0.05). The motivation to exercise is high in psychological categories and social categories; leisure sports participation is high in psychological category, social relations, and environmental categories; sports consumption scores high in psychological categories and environmental categories; information channels score high in psychological categories. And there is no significant correlation between leisure sports cognition and quality of life.

Conclusion: The quality of life of college students in Putian shows differences between gender, grades, and disciplines. Boys are more independent, but they need to be improved in terms of social and psychological dimensions. Senior students facing poor emotional experiences such as graduation and anxiety affected their quality of life. Liberal arts and science students have their own strengths in their lifestyles. They have strong ability to solve problems independently in science and science, but they are fragile and lack of social support. Liberal art students are healthier but have poor independence.