Precariat in the Social Factory: Exploitation and Resistance among Food Delivery Platform Workers in an Industrial City

Main Article Content

Preuk Taotawin

Abstract

This article applies Mario Trontithe’s concept of the social factory to examine the labour and everyday lives of food delivery platform workers (riders) in an industrial city. It explores how the industrial city is constituted as a social factory, how riders participate in value production and are subjected to exploitation through the extraction of surplus value, and how they resist these power relations. Utilizing an  action research approach  combined with quantitative and qualitative methods, the study draws on a survey of 65 riders, in-depth interviews with 12 riders and 2 trade unionists, and both participant and non-participant observations of riders’ daily lives in the Bo Win Subdistrict of Chonburi Province between September 2024 and March 2025. This article shows that riders represent a clear case of “precarious workers within the social factory.” They are situated within insecure employment conditions, compelled to bear risks displaced onto them by capital, and, at the same time, produce value within the circuit of production, distribution, exchange, and consumption under contemporary capitalism, in which the logic and relations of factory-based production have expanded to dominate society as a whole. The article therefore proposes Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a policy agenda and a mechanism for redistributing wealth and reducing social inequality, aimed at protecting riders and other groups of precarious workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taotawin, P. (2026). Precariat in the Social Factory: Exploitation and Resistance among Food Delivery Platform Workers in an Industrial City. Journal of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, 22(1), 28–64. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jla_ubu/article/view/296287
Section
Research

References

Angeles, L., & Sunanta, S. (2009). Demanding daughter duty: Gender, community, village transformation, and transnational marriages in Northeast Thailand. Critical Asian Studies, 41(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710903328075

Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press.

Chaiwat, T., Muttaklin, K., & Khunkonlakarn, K. (2022). The project drives policy proposals on the quality of life of platform workers (Research report). [in Thai]. Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University.

Fortunati, L. (1995). The arcane of reproduction: Housework, prostitution, labor and capital. Autonomedia.

Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002

Glassman, J. (2004). Thailand at the margins: Internationalization of the state and the transformation of labour. Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell.

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

Kanjanakun, S. (2025, November 30). “What is UBI?”—Universal basic income may become reality as AI and automation render money less meaningful. [in Thai]. ThaiPublica. https://thaipublica.org/2025/11/sunisa-55-universal-basic-income/

Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. Routledge.

Kitirianglarp, K. (2017a). Lesson 1: The birth of Autonomia and the Marxist theory of Mario Tronti. [in Thai]. In Autonomia: Cognitive capitalism, immaterial labor, and the revolution of the common (pp. 26–69). Illumination.

Kitirianglarp, K. (2017b). Lesson 3: From “the womb as a means of production” to the rise of the service sector in capitalism: Reproduction of housework and women in autonomist Marxist theory. [in Thai]. In Autonomia: Cognitive capitalism, immaterial labor, and the revolution of the common (pp. 116–161). Illumination.

Luekitinan, W. (2021). Quality of life and work condition of sub-contract workers at industrial estate in the Eastern Region. [in Thai]. Social Science Journal of Prachachuen Research Network, 3(3), 15–31.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.

Marx, K. (n.d.). Capital (Vol. 1). Progress Publishers.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). Penguin Books.

Munck, R. (2013). The precariat: A view from the South. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800751

Rigg, J., & Salamanca, A. (2011). Connecting lives, living and locations: Mobility and spatial signatures in Northeast Thailand, 1982–2009. Critical Asian Studies, 43(4), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2011.623516

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

Taotawin, P., & Turarak, W. (2023). Accident, health and occupational risk insurance of motorcycle food couriers in platform-based delivery services. [in Thai]. Journal of Anthropology, Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (JASAC), 6(2), 129–178.

Teerakowitkajorn, K. (2019). Masculinized labor activism and geographies of household reproduction in Thailand’s “Detroit” (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University).

Teerakowitkajorn, K., & Tularak, W. (2020). New forms of platform mediated work for on-demand food delivery. [in Thai]. Friedrich Ebert Foundation & Just Economy and Labor Institute.

Thammaboosadee, S. (2013). The precariat: Marginal people in the center of neoliberal capitalism. [in Thai]. Journal of Social Sciences, 43(2), Article 8.

Tronti, M. (2019a). Workers and capital (D. Broder, Trans.). Verso.

Tronti, M. (2019b). Factory and society. In D. Broder (Trans.), Workers and capital (pp. 56–84). Verso.

Tronti, M. (2019c). The strategy of refusal. In D. Broder (Trans.), Workers and capital (pp. 335–362). Verso.

Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2019). Platform-capital’s “app-etite” for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911

Wantanasombat, A., & Pitaktharnin, A. (2021). Rider-hero-shackles: Working conditions and social security of food delivery workers on platform economy in the situation of COVID-19 epidemic (Research report). [in Thai]. Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.