Solidarity at the Side of the Road: Sources and Limitations of Food Delivery Platform Workers’ Collective Action

Main Article Content

Preuk Taotawin

Abstract

As the phenomenon of collective organization and protests among food delivery platform workers (riders) has become widespread, this research article seeks to address the following three questions: How does solidarity among riders emerge? How is it related to collective action? And, what are the limitations of solidarity and collective action among riders? This article is based on qualitative research that employed multiple data collection techniques, including in-depth interviews, surveys, focus group discussions, and monitoring of rider groups’ Facebook pages. Additionally, it used the concept of solidarity developed within the Marxist tradition as a framework for data analysis. This article argues that working-class solidarity does not necessarily arise from ideological organization by a revolutionary party or labor union in a top-down manner. Instead, it can emerge organically amidst daily work activities, as riders' daily work on the streets leads to “solidarity on the side of the rode”. However, the solidarity of riders has its limitations, both at the individual and the structural levels. The article suggests that the field of Thai labor studies should place greater emphasis on the issue of solidarity in order to engage with this important topic in the international academic community and to better understand the Thai working-class movement as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taotawin, P. (2025). Solidarity at the Side of the Road: Sources and Limitations of Food Delivery Platform Workers’ Collective Action. Journal of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, 21(1), 1–27. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jla_ubu/article/view/283474
Section
Research

References

Ativanichayapong, N. (2024a). History of the Thai labor movement to the decade of disunity, 1977–1987 A.D. In N. Ativanichayapong (Ed.), The labor movement and its social and political role: A collection of contemporary labor movement articles (pp. 1–64). [in Thai]. Bangkok: Puey Ungphakorn School of Development Studies.

Ativanichayapong, N. (2024b). Social movement trade unionism: A global debate. In N. Ativanichayapong (Ed.), The labor movement and its social and political role: A collection of contemporary labor movement articles (pp. 65–102). [in Thai]. Bangkok: Puey Ungphakorn School of Development Studies.

Atzeni, M. (2010). Workplace conflict: Mobilization and solidarity in Argentina. Palgrave Macmillan.

Atzeni, M. (2021). Workers’ organizations and the fetishism of the trade union form: Toward new pathways for research on the labour movement? Globalizations, 18(8), 1349–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1910993

Basualdo, V., Dias, H., Herberg, M., Schmalz, S., Serrano, M., & Vandaele, K. (2021). Building workers' power in digital capitalism: Old and new labour struggles. FES.

Brown, A. (2002). Locating working-class power. In K. Hewison (Ed.), Political change in Thailand: Democracy and participation (2nd ed., pp. 163–178). Routledge.

Cant, C., & Woodcock, J. (2020). The fast food shutdown: From disorganisation to action in the service sector. Capital & Class, 44(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820934641

Chatrakul Na Ayudhaya, S. (2012). Problems and obstacles in building strength and unity of the Thai labor movement. [in Thai]. In Ativanichayapong, N. et al. (Eds.), Labor and injustice, problems and solutions: Final research report (pp. 7–1 – 7–144). Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University.

Cini, L., & Goldmann, B. (2020). The worker capabilities approach: Insights from worker mobilisations in Italian logistics and food delivery. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 948–967.

Cini, L., Maccarrone, V., & Tassinari, A. (2021). With or without U(nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801211014674

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the "just-in-time workforce": On-demand work, crowd work, and labor protection in the "gig economy." Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471–504.

Defossez, D. (2022). The employment status of food delivery riders in Europe and the UK: Self-employed or worker? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211065726

della Porta, D., et al. (2022). Mobilizing against the odds: Solidarity in action in the platform economy. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 32(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00471-z

Fantasia, R. (1988). Cultures of solidarity: Consciousness, action, and contemporary American workers. University of California Press.

Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2019). The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 528–548.

Klatookwan, N. (2013). Work and lives of female laborers in Nava Nakorn industrial zone: Time management and self-making through women’s meaning of times [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. [in Thai].

Kumnak, P. (2005). Everyday forms of struggle of Thai workers: A case study of a factory in Samutprakan Province [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. [in Thai].

Lei, Y.-W. (2021). Delivering solidarity: Platform architecture and collective contention in China’s platform economy. American Sociological Review, 86(2), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122421996749

Maffie, M. D. (2020). The role of digital communities in organizing gig workers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 59(1), 123–149.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867)

Mieruch, Y., & McFarlane, D. (2023). Gig economy riders on social media in Thailand: Contested identities and emergent civil society organisations. Voluntas, 34, 1232–1242.

Mills, M. B. (1999). Thai women in the global labor force: Consuming desires, contested selves. Rutgers University Press.

Morgan, G., & Pulignano, V. (2020). Solidarity at work: Concepts, levels and challenges. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 18–34.

Panimbang, F., Arifin, S., Riyadi, S., & Septi Utami, D. (2020). Resisting exploitation by algorithms: Drivers’ contestation of app-based transport in Indonesia. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Pangsapa, P. (2007). Textures of struggle: The emergence of resistance among garment workers in Thailand. ILR Press/Cornell University Press.

Pasquier, V., & Wood, A. (2018). The power of social media as a labour campaigning tool: Lessons from OUR Walmart and the Fight for 15. ETUI Policy Brief. European Trade Union Institute.

Polletta, F. (1999). “Free spaces” in collective action. Theory and Society, 28(1), 1–38.

Qadri, R. (2023). Algorithmized not atomized: The distributed solidarity of Jakarta's gig workers. International Journal of Communication, 17, 3899–3918.

Rocket Media Lab. (2024, January 22). In 5 years, what issues rides fight with platform. [in Thai]. https://rocketmedialab.co/rider-protest/

Schmalz, S., Ludwig, C., & Webster, E. (2018). The power resources approach: Developments and challenges. Global Labour Journal, 9(2), 113–134.

Soonthornwipart, P. (2015). The development and role of labor union in the eastern region of Thailand [Doctoral dissertation, Burapha University]. [in Thai].

Stewart, P., Shanahan, G., & Smith, M. (2020). Individualism and collectivism at work in an era of deindustrialization: Work narratives of food delivery couriers in the platform economy. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00034

Sun, P., & Chen, J. Y. (2021). Platform labour and contingent agency in China. China Perspectives, 2021(1), 19–27.

Taotawin, P., & Tularak, W. (2023a). Accidents and health of motorcycle drivers delivering food under the control of the platform. [in Thai]. Local Development Institute Foundation.

Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54.

Teerakowitkajorn, K. (2019). Masculinized labor activism and geographies of household reproduction in Thailand’s ‘Detroit’ [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University].

Wantanasombat, A., & Pitaktharnin, A. (2021). Rider-hero-shackles: Working conditions and social security of food delivery workers on platform economy in the situation of COVID-19 epidemic. [in Thai]. Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.

Woodcock, J., & Cant, C. (2022). Platform worker organising at Deliveroo in the UK: From wildcat strikes to building power. Journal of Labor and Society, 25(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10041