Basic Japanese Teaching Development Using Corrective Feedback in the Classroom: A Case Study of the First Year Japanese Language Major Students at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Main Article Content

Walee Rungratthawatchai

Abstract

This research aimed to survey approaches to improve and develop elementary Japanese language courses, focusing on both course contents and teaching methods. Consequently, effective Japanese language learning could be the outcome, as well as allowing the students to utilize their Japanese skills as a foundation for other skill practice courses. The study method used a questionnaire to survey the problems and obstacles faced by Japanese language learners at the basic level and the use of ‘corrective feedback’ by teachers during class (i.e., language learning supportive feedback) as well as using high-frequency feedback. Fifty-one first-year students taking the two-semester ‘Basic Japanese’ during the year were the target population for this survey.


The survey results found that there were obstacles to and problems with learning Japanese. The problems, arranged in order from highest to lowest, were as follows: memorizing kanji, word order in a subject–object–verb (SOV) framework, and postpositional particles and the conjugation of various types of words in Japanese. Regarding the use of ‘corrective feedback’ by teachers during class, the language learning supportive feedback which effected the students’ language learning the most was corrective feedback where the teacher used ‘explicit correction’. This feedback was often in the form of word input correction, which allowed students to receive correction from the teacher immediately. In addition ’clarification requests’ were recognized as having the least effect on students’ learning. When comparing the duration of the students Japanese language studies, it was found that those who did not have a Japanese language background faced more problems and obstacles related to Japanese word order than those who had a Japanese language background.  Moreover, it was found that ‘Elicitation’ was the type of corrective feedback that had the greatest effect on learning for people who did not have a Japanese language background.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rungratthawatchai, W. . (2024). Basic Japanese Teaching Development Using Corrective Feedback in the Classroom: A Case Study of the First Year Japanese Language Major Students at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. Journal of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, 20(1), 217–243. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jla_ubu/article/view/271322
Section
Research

References

Besse, H. & Porquier, R. (1991). Grammaire et didactique des langues. Paris: Hatier/Didier.

Ellis, R. (2015). “Form-Focused Approaches to Learning, Teaching, and Researching Grammar.” In Christison, M. st. al., editor. Teaching and Learning English Grammar: Research Findings and Future Directions (Global Research on Teaching and Learning English). (p. 194-214). New York: Routledge.

Gaonac’h, D. (1991). Théories d'apprentissage et acquisition d'une Langue étrangère. Paris: Credif-Hatier.

Giacobbe, J. (1990) “Le Recours à la Langue Première: une approche cognitive”, in Gaonac’h, D., editor. Acquisition et utilisation d’une langue étrangère. (p. 115-123). Paris: Hachette.

Hatasa, Y. & Fujiwara, Y. (2012). Effects of Corrective Feedback in JFL Classroom. [in Japanese]. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 61 (2), 229-237.

Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. (p. 120). London & New York: Longman.

Long, M.H. (1981). Input, Interaction, and Second-Language Acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278.

Lyster, R. & Mori, H. (2006) Interactional Feedback and Instructional Counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2), p. 269-300.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37­66.

Nabei, T. (2015).「ウァーバル・インタラクションと訂正フィードバック」, Oozeki, H., editor.『フ ィードバック研究への招待』. (p. 42-46). Japan: Kurosio Publishers.

Purinthrapibal, S. (2010). L1 and Foreign Learning. [in Thai]. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6 (2), 48-77.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C., editor. Input in Second Language Acquisition. (p. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.