The Role of Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University Student Leaders in the Political Decision on the Democratic Way of Life: The Case Study of Election of the President of the Provincial Administrative Organization and Member of the Ubon Ratchathani Provincial Council
Keywords:
democratic way of life, political decision, role of student leadersAbstract
The aims of this research were as follows: 1) to study the factors of the political environment of student leaders in Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 2) to study political decision-making in a democratic way of student leaders in Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, and 3) to study the role of Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University student leaders in making political decisions in a democratic way: a case study of the election of the Provincial Administrative Organization and Ubon Ratchathani Provincial Councilors. The research sample of 132 student leaders and a simple random sampling method. The data were collected by questionnaires and analyzed using mean and standard deviation. The qualitative study's target group of ten student leaders was chosen using a purposive sampling method, and data were collected through interviews and analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that 1) the overall political environment factors were at a high level. The part with the highest average was political developed, 2) the overall democratic political decision-making was at a high level, and the part with the highest average was the role of a political observer, respectively.
References
Election Commission of Thailand. (2021). Election commission of Thailand. Recruitment manual local council members or local administrators: Election Management and Voting Department. [in Thai]
Kenaphoom, S. (2016). Political decision on the democratic way of life: Concept and forms. Humanities & Social Sciences, 33(2), pp. 89-119. [in Thai]
Khantikul, P. (2010). A political participation model of the people in Dusit District, Bangkok. Bangkok: Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan & D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), pp. 607-610.
Nuchaudom, C & Paranakian, K. (2019). Criteria for decision making in selecting local representative. Pathumthani University Academic Journal, 11(2), pp. 32-44. [in Thai]
Panyapa, R., Wuthikaro, S. & Supasorn, P. (2015). The application of concept on dignity in Thai society according to buddhist perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Khon Kaen University, 32(3), pp. 1-20. [in Thai]
Thangjuong, Y. (2006). The democratic political culture of the student of Uttaradit Rajabhat University students. Uttaradit: Uttaradit Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Uwanno, B & Burikul, T. (2007). Participatory democracy. Bangkok: printing press of Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Wiset, S. (2012). Political participation process of undergraduate students in public administration program, Faculty of Arts and Science, Nakhon Phanom University. Nakhon Phanom University Journal, 2(1), pp. 5-12. [in Thai]
Srisa-ard, B. (2002). Basic rresearch. (9th edition). Bangkok: Suwiriyasan Co., Ltd. [in Thai]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (JHUSOC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใดๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักอักษรจากวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ก่อนเท่านั้น
