DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL USING SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND SITUATED LEARNING THEORIES TO ENHANCE CIVIC RESPONSIBILITY AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT OF UNDERGRADUATES IN CHINA
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this study were (1) to develop an instructional model using social cognitive and situated learning theories to enhance Chinese undergraduates’ civic responsibility and learning achievement, and (2) to validate the model’s quality regarding its feasibility for use in a real class. This study adopted a two-phase mixed research model combining qualitative and quantitative methods as follows: (1) Model development phase: Firstly, the researchers reviewed relevant literature and conducted semi-structured interviews with five experts and ten undergraduates to clarify the theoretical basis and research focus. Secondly, the researchers designed an instructional model using social cognitive and situated learning theories based on the findings from the first step. Thirdly, the researchers invited five experts to validate the model using the Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) and a five-point Likert scale, and the model was revised based on experts’ recommendations and (2) Pilot implementation phase: In this phase, the researchers developed experimental tools and conducted a pilot teaching study with sixty non-sample students. The study results were as follows:
(1) The semi-structured interviews affirmed the necessity of developing a new instructional model and the effectiveness of applying social cognitive and situated learning theories in the model development. The developed instructional model using social cognitive and situated learning theories had seven core elements, including instructional theories, principles, objectives, contents, processes, environment and evaluation. Combining the opinions of five experts, the instructional model achieved an IOC score of 1.00 and an overall mean score of 4.72, indicating high content validity and appropriateness. (2) The pilot teaching results initially validated the model’s feasibility for use in a real class, and the participants expressed high levels of agreement with the model, citing improvements in their mastery of course knowledge and civic responsibility.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Chen, G. S. (1998). Educational principles. East China Normal University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1992). Cognitive development: Past, present, and future. Developmental Psychology, 28(6), 998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.998
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1972). Models of teaching. Prentice Hall.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2025). Does artificial intelligence-assisted learning positively affect college students’ motivation, emotion regulation, and academic uncertainty? Insight from situated learning theory. Learning and Motivation, 92, Article 102202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102202.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., Panigrahi, P. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Role of internet self-efficacy and interactions on blended learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08874417.2021.2004565
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). Pearson Higher Education.
The CPC Central Committee & The State Council of China. (2025). The Education Power Construction Plan Outline (2024-2035). The CPC Central Committee & The State Council of China. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2025/issue_11846/202
/content_7002799.html
Tianjin Normal University. (2022). Survey report on Chinese university students’ sense of social responsibility. Tianjin Normal University Press.
Tzou, Y. Z. (2024). Situated learning in the translation class: Exploring the effects of engaging college students in an online crowdsourcing translation project. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 18(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/
X.2024.2423476
Wang, F. H., & Noordin, Z. M. (2024). The Cultivation of College Students’ Sense of Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Student’s Involvement in Social Practice. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2780–2788. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/21096
Wei, J. P., Wei, N., & Zhang, J. J. (2015). A survey report on the social responsibility of college students nationwide. China Book Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016