BEYOND THE PLATE: THAI BEEF CONSUMER SEGMENTATION BY ATTITUDES

Main Article Content

Suwanna Sayruamyat
Tidarat Kumkit
Piyathida Thathong

Abstract

This article aimed to classify beef consumer segments based on their attitudes toward beef, and to investigate willingness to pay for beef dishes of each segment. The sample size of the study consisted of 625 consumers who consumed meat, but some rejected beef. Participants were selected through accidental sampling of whoever was willing to participate in the study. The instrument for collecting data was an online questionnaire. The data analysis applied descriptive statistics and K-means cluster analysis to identify beef consumer segments. The research yielded the following results:


  • Thai beef consumption was influenced by emotional values, taste, and distinct flavor profiles. Functional fat and marbling value were preferred by current and past consumers. Functional issues like smell, digestibility, health concerns, and texture were avoided. Family traditions, cultural or moral avoidance, and religious beliefs also contribute. Emotional and financial values were less common.

  • Three consumer segments: selective, considerate, and devoted consumer segments were categorised by attitudes toward beef consumption, which indicated different consumption patterns and expenditure for beef consumption. Considerate and devoted consumers had a good attitude towards Thai beef, and they were likely to pay more for quality beef dishes.

  • Despite the low willingness of the selective segment that the price of beef menus was higher compared to other ordinary menus, this segment was conscious of the superior quality and hygiene.

This study provided insights into beef consumer segments exploring their consumption patterns, attitudes towards Thai beef, and WTP for beef dishes, which was useful for beef entrepreneurs developing a differentiated marketing scheme to promote and increase Thai beef's market share.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sayruamyat, S. ., Kumkit, T., & Thathong, P. (2025). BEYOND THE PLATE: THAI BEEF CONSUMER SEGMENTATION BY ATTITUDES. Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 7(1), 314–329. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/art/article/view/285937
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Suwanna Sayruamyat, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Tidarat Kumkit, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University

Department of Cooperatives

Piyathida Thathong, School of Business Administration, Bangkok University

Department of Marketing

References

Adalja, A., Hanson, J., Towe, C., & Tselepidakis, E. (2015). An examination of consumer willingness to pay for local products. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 44(3), 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500005050

Bunmee, T., Chaiwang, N., Kaewkot, C., & Jaturasitha, S. (2018). Current situation and future prospects for beef production in Thailand—A review. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 31(7), 968-975. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0201

Corsi, A., & Novelli, S. (2002). Consumers' Willingness to Pay a Price for Organic Beef Meat. Proceedings of the 10th EAAE Congress (pp. 28-31).

Department of Research and Strategy National Food Institute. (2023). Current Situation and Direction of the Thai Beef Cattle Industry. Meat & Poultry Edition, (67). https://www.foodfocusthailand.com/eBook/SubMeat67/mobile/index.html#p=1

DLD. (2024). Livestock statistion in Thailand 2024. https://ict.dld.go.th/ webnew/images/stories/report/regislives/2567/eRegist2567.pdf

Feuz, R., Norwood, F. B., & Ramanathan, R. (2020). The spillover effect of marketing discolored beef on consumer preferences for nondiscolored beef. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 52(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1017 /aae.2019.39

Grebitus, C., Jensen, H. H., Roosen, J., & Sebranek, J. G. (2013). Fresh meat packaging: Consumer acceptance of modified atmosphere packaging including carbon monoxide. Journal of Food Protection, 76(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.4315/ 0362-028X.JFP-12-045

Gutkowska, K., Czarnecki, J., Glabska, D., Guzek, D., & Batóg, A. (2018). Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions. Roczniki Panstwowego Zakładu Higieny, 69(4).

Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., Resconi, V. C., & Troy, D. (2014). Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat science, 98(3), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.meatsci.2014.06.007

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux.

Makweya, F. L. & Oluwatayo, I. B. (2019). Consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for graded beef in Polokwane municipality, South Africa. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 8(1), 46-54. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2019.7654.

Meenongyai, W. ., Pattarajinda, V. ., M. Stelzleni, A. ., Sethakul, J. ., Duangjinda , M. ., & Sae-Eaw , A. . (2017). Beef consumption and selection bias in Thailand. KHON KAEN AGRICULTURE. JOURNAL, 45(4), 731–740. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/agkasetkaj/article/view/252435

Mehrjerdi, M .Z., & Woods, T. (2024). Consumer willingness-to-pay for local food in alternative restaurant formats. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 36(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2022.2084482

OAE. (2024). Situation of important agricultural products and trends in 2025. https://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2566/trend2567.pdf

Pethick, D. W., Hocquette, J. F., Scollan, N. D., & Dunshea, F. R. (2021). Improving the nutritional, sensory and market value of meat products from sheep and cattle. Animal, 15, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100356

Salehzadeh, R., & Pool, J. K. (2017). Brand attitude and perceived value and purchase intention toward global luxury brands. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1236311

Schiffman, L. G., & Wisenblit, J. (2015). Consumer Behavior (12th ed.). Pearson Education, Prentice Hall.

Schnettler, B., Sepulveda, N., Bravo, S., Grunert, K. G., & Hueche, C. (2018). Consumer acceptance of a functional processed meat product made with different meat sources. British Food Journal, 120(2), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2017-0211

Suwunnamek, O., Asawaruangpipop, P., & Toyoda, T. (2010). Buying Behavior Of Premium Beef Product In Bangkok. https://www.academia.edu/106826780 /Buying_ behavior_of_premium_beef_products_in_Bangkok

Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0

Thies, A. J., Altmann, B. A., Countryman, A. M., Smoth, C. & Nair, M. N. (2024). Consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for beef based on color and price discounts. Meat Science, 217, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109597

Zakowska-Biemans, S., Pieniak, Z., Gutkowska, K., Wierzbicki, J., Cieszynska, K., Sajdakowska, M., & Kosicka-Geska, M. (2017). Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland. Meat science, 124, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.001

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446