The Assessment of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University’s Action Plan in Fiscal Year 2020

Abstract

The purposes of this research were: 1) to study the patterns and factors affecting the assessment of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University’s action plan in fiscal year 2020 2) to find a way to develop and improve the
assessment of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University’s action plan in fiscal year 2020. This research was a qualitative research
study. This sample group included 8 personnel who were responsible for the assessment of Phetchaburi Rajabhat
University’s action plan in fiscal year 2020. This research was a purposive sampling to obtain in-depth information covering the topics studied. Research tools included documentary research combined with in-depth interviews. Content analysis was used to analyze the data.
Research indicated the following results:
1. Factors affecting the assessment of the government action plan for the fiscal year 2020 of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University were: 1) personnel aspects 2) timing aspects 3) rules/regulations related to operations 4) university
policies and 5) In terms of decision-making powers in the performance appraisal for the fiscal year 2020, all factors
affect the operation.
2. Guidelines for developing and improving the assessment of the government action plan for the fiscal year
B.E. 2020 of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, such as;
2.1 The university should pay more attention to the assessment of the Phetchaburi Rajabhat University Action
Plan and set appropriate assessment criteria that can clearly reflect the performance at the impact level and meet the targets.
2.2 Knowledge Development of Personnel Understanding and realizing the benefits of the annual government action plan assessment.
2.3 Development of administrative information systems for collecting and processing achievements
according to government action plans and university development plans.
2.4 Developing communication in the organization to be creative increase positive energy in management
by giving personnel a positive perspective on organizational development, self-development, and the development of
individual performance appraisal guidelines that are consistent with the workload and the situation of the university now
and in the future to further develop the organization.