A Sustainable Sufficiency Economy Model Based on Community Identity in Security-Challenged Areas: A Case Study of Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces

Main Article Content

Danuvat Suwanvong
Jiraporn Ruangying
Afsa Arwae

Abstract

This study aims to examine current contextual and spatial changes in Thailand’s southern border provinces, assess residents’ quality of life amid persistent security challenges, analyze security-related environmental factors that influence everyday life, and develop a sustainable sufficiency-economy model grounded in community identity within security-challenged contexts. This study employed a mixed-methods design that integrated qualitative and quantitative approaches. In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 representatives from government agencies and a focus group with 30 community leaders. Semi-structured interview guides and focus group protocols were employed, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. For the quantitative component, surveys were administered to 384 residents in the southern border provinces, and the data were analyzed using frequency distributions, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Findings revealed three significant contextual challenges: ongoing unrest and security issues; the spread of drug abuse; and the impact of large-scale infrastructure projects and Malaysia’s rapid development. Regarding quality of life, concerns emerged in four areas: rising chronic conditions such as office syndrome, increased cases of depression and anxiety, persistent economic hardship and unemployment, and heightened feelings of insecurity in daily life. Survey results confirmed that the environmental dimension of quality of life scored lowest, particularly with respect to financial sufficiency for basic needs. Despite these challenges, the findings indicate that substantial social and cultural capital remains in the region, reflected in high evaluations of several security-environment dimensions, except for the economic dimension. Based on these findings, the proposed model for a sustainable sufficiency economy consists of six mechanisms: network building, participatory research, knowledge-based learning, communication for change, behavioral incentives, and community-based development through integrated collaboration. The study highlights how community identity and the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy can be mobilized to enhance quality of life, strengthen security, and promote sustainable development in security-challenged border areas.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suwanvong, D., Ruangying, J., & Arwae, A. (2026). A Sustainable Sufficiency Economy Model Based on Community Identity in Security-Challenged Areas: A Case Study of Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 35(-), 197–217. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/293302
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Danuvat Suwanvong, Faculty of Management Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

Corresponding author

References

• Alkire, S. (2003). A conceptual framework for human security (CRISE Working Paper No. 2). Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity, University of Oxford. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08cf740f0b652dd001694/wp2.pdf

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

• Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

• Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824

• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “participation”: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

• Coordination Center Region 5. (2022). Porpeang the explorer: Sufficiency economy [Knowledge about sufficiency economy]. Internal Security Operations Command. https://www.isoc.go.th/index.php

• Mahatnirunkul, S., Tuntipivatanakul, W., Poompaisanchai, W., Wongsuwan, K., & Promanajirangkul, R. (1997). Prianthiat baep wat khunaphap chiwit khong ongkan anamai lok chut 100 tua chiwat lae 26 tua chiwat [A comparative study of the World Health Organization’s quality of life assessment: WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF (26 items)]. Suan Prung Psychiatric Hospital.

• Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. SAGE.

• Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6

• Oakley, P. (1991). Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. International Labour Organization.

• Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). (2007). Pramuan kham nai phra boromracho-wat phra bat somdet phra chao yu hua Bhumibol Adulyadej tangtae Phutthasakkarat 2493–2549 thi kiao khong kap prachaya khong setthakit pho phiang [Compilation of terms from the royal speeches of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama IX) between 1950–2006 related to the philosophy of sufficiency economy]. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_w3c/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=9208

• Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). (2017). The Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017–2021). https://www.nesdc.go.th/download/the-twelfth-national-economic-and-social-development-plan-2017-2021/

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011, October 12). How’s life?: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020, March 9). How’s life? 2020: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en

• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.

• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books.

• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. Oxford University Press. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr1994encompletenostats.pdf

• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1993). APPEAL training materials for continuing education personnel (ATLP-CE), v. IV: Quality of life improvement programmes (Document No. BKL/93/M/252-2000). UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000126321

• World Health Organization (WHO). (1997). WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/63482

• World Health Organization (WHO). (1998, June 16). Health promotion glossary (WHO/HPR/HEP/98.1). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HPR-HEP-98.1

• World Health Organization (WHO). (2012). WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol